Skip to main content
California Department of Education Logo

CMA Participation Criteria for Science


In November 2007, the State Board of Education (SBE) adopted the California Modified Assessment (CMA) Participation Criteria. The CMA Participation Criteria provides individualized education program (IEP) teams the necessary criteria to make decisions about which students should participate in the CMA and are based, in part, on Title 34 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 200—Title I—Improving the Academic Achievement of the Disadvantaged. 

CMA Participation Criteria Section 1. Previous Participation of the SBE-approved participation criteria states:

  1. Previous Participation

CST

The student shall have taken the California Standards Test (CST) in a previous year and scored Below Basic or Far Below Basic in the subject area being assessed by the CMA and may have taken the CST with modifications.

CAPA

Previous participation in the California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA) shall not preclude a student from participation in the CMA.

  • The student shall have taken the CAPA Level 2–5 in two previous years and received a performance level of either Proficient or Advanced

Note:   The student shall not be allowed to take both the CAPA and CMA. Students shall take either:

– CAPA in all subject areas;

– CST in all subject areas;

– CMA in all subject areas; or

– a combination of CST and CMA in the subject areas being assessed.

Since the science assessments are not given prior to grade five, a student may fill the first participation criterion if the student:

  • has taken the California Standards Test (CST) in a previous year, and
  • scored Below Basic or Far Below Basic in English-language arts (ELA) or mathematics, and may have taken the CST with accommodations and/or modifications.

CMA Participation Criteria Section 3. Response to Appropriate Instruction of the SBE-approved participation criteria states:

  1. Response To Appropriate Instruction

The student’s progress to date in response to appropriate grade- level instruction, including special education and related services designed to address the student’s individual needs, is such that, even if significant growth occurs, the IEP team is reasonably certain that the student will not achieve grade-level proficiency within the year covered by the student’s IEP plan.

  • The student who is assessed with the CMA has access to the curriculum, including instruction and materials for the grade in which the student is enrolled.
  • The student’s IEP plan includes grade-level California content standards-based goals and support in the classroom for a subject or subjects assessed by the CMA.
  • The student has received special education and related services to support access to and progress in the general curriculum in which the student is enrolled.
  • The IEP team has determined that the student will not achieve grade-level proficiency even with instructional intervention.

The participation criteria requirement (above) that an IEP include “grade-level California content standards-based goals and supports in the classroom for a subject or subjects assessed by the CMA” has caused confusion for IEP teams.

Traditionally, IEP goals address English-language arts, math, and prerequisite skills. Other content areas are usually addressed by related goals, supports and related services. Science for example, might be addressed by having a goal for vocabulary development that can support the student learning science vocabulary, and in the science classroom, can aid the student in gaining access to the science curriculum.

Questions:   California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress Office | caaspp@cde.ca.gov | 916-445-8765
Last Reviewed: Monday, April 27, 2015

Share this Page

Recently Posted in Testing

  • CA Assessment System Expansion Recommendations (PDF) (added 28-Apr-2016)
    Four recommendations to expand California’s Comprehensive Assessment System.
  • Digital Library State Network of Educators (updated 15-Apr-2016)
    Information on the State Network of Educators (SNE), a team of educators which evaluates resources for inclusion in the Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium's Digital Library of formative assessment tools and practices.
  • Meet an SNE Member (updated 15-Apr-2016)
    As a new attribute, CDE will be introducing one of California’s outstanding members of the Digital Library State Network of Educators (SNE) each month.
  • CAASPP Update, Issue 149 (added 14-Apr-2016)
    California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) e-mail update, April 13, 2016.
  • Summative Assessments Message Shifts (added 14-Apr-2016)
    Messaging Shifts for the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments What Parents Want to Know.

  • Formative Assessment in Action Video Series (updated 12-Apr-2016)
    The Formative Assessment in Action Video Series (hyperlink to YouTube channel) features California members of the Digital Library State Network of Educators (SNE) demonstrating formative assessment techniques in their classrooms.
  • 2016-17 and 2017-18 CELDT Information Guide (PDF) (added 11-Apr-2016)
    2016–17 and 2017–18 California English Language Development Test (CELDT) Information Guide
  • CAASPP Update, Issue 148 (added 11-Apr-2016)
    California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) e-mail update, April 6, 2016.
  • Assessment Apportionments (updated 05-Apr-2016)
    Information regarding apportionment to reimburse local educational agencies (LEAs) for specified annual assessment testing.
  • CAASPP Update, Issue 147 (added 01-Apr-2016)
    California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) e-mail update, March 30, 2016.