Skip to content
Printer-friendly version

California State Board of Education Policy #01-02


March 2001


School Safety, Discipline, and Attendance


Integrated in text.


This policy supersedes a policy on the same subject originally adopted in October 1983
and revised in September 1993.

It is the policy of the State Board of Education (State Board) that all students enrolled in public schools in California have the right to safe schools.1 The State Board believes that students cannot benefit fully from an educational program unless they attend school regularly in an environment that is free from physical and psychological harm. The State Board also believes that the leadership in providing safe schools, establishing behavior standards, and improving student attendance must come primarily from local education agency (LEA) boards, superintendents and their staff, and site-level administrators. The leadership must be continuous in order to support comprehensive efforts at each school site to assist students in becoming selfdirected and responsible for their own behavior.

It is further the policy of the State Board (supported by reference in statute 2 ) that the substantial benefit students will derive from regular attendance in a safe and orderly school environment justifies a high priority and commitment of personnel and fiscal resources by the Legislature, Governor, and California Department of Education, and by LEAs.

In accordance with California Education Code Section 35294.1 et seq., the State Board recognizes that a beginning step toward safer schools is the development of a comprehensive plan for school safety by every public school and district in the state. The plan should be developed and integrated into the ongoing school planning efforts that currently exist. Education Code Section 35294.6(a) requires that the plan be reviewed and updated annually by March 1 .

Also, Education Code Section 35294.6(b) requires each school to report in July on the status of its school safety plan (including a description of the plan's key elements) in the annual school accountability report card prepared pursuant to Education Code Sections 33126 et seq. and 35256 et seq. There should be a district-wide statement of philosophy, an enabling policy, and guidelines that serve as a foundation for safe school plans created by individual schools.3 The statement should provide a clear sense of purpose and exemplify district support for the entire planning process. The State Board acknowledges that a student's academic achievement is a great deterrent to school violence; hence, a comprehensive plan should include a focus on high expectations of student performance and behavior in all aspects of the school experience.

Effective safe school plans are developed cooperatively by parents (guardians), students,

teachers, administrators, counselors, and community agencies, including local law enforcement, and approved by the local governing board. The State Board also strongly encourages all LEAs to establish working and collaborative relationships with law enforcement agencies, service agencies, parents (guardians), and community members in order to provide safe and orderly schools, improve attendance, and expand services to students and parents (guardians).

The State Board believes that in order for a comprehensive program for school safety to have long-lasting effects, it should include a planned sequence of strategies and activities appropriate for all students and should be based on specific needs identified by a broad-based safe school committee.4 The program should have a major focus that is preventive in nature and supports the development of youths' assets.5 In addition, it should include provisions to deal with critical issues, such as truancy; racial conflict; bullying; gang activities on campus; violent behaviors; weapons possession on campus; drug, alcohol, and other substance abuse; and natural disasters.

The plan should also incorporate after-school programs and extracurricular and co-curricular activities that address individual student needs to belong and to be respected and appreciated.

Finally, the plan should include procedures for accommodating children and youth with disabilities.

The State Board believes that comprehensive safe school plans and programs should focus attention on the strengths and experiences that students, teachers, administrators, and other school personnel bring to the school campus; the physical setting and conditions in which education takes place; the organizational and interpersonal processes that occur in and around school; and the general atmosphere or spirit of the school.

Comprehensive plans and programs will provide a positive learning environment through the implementation of:

Local plans for safe schools should be based on and/or include the following elements:

  1. Collaborative relationships among community agencies, parents (guardians), local law enforcement agencies, and the school that lead to a common vision of a safe school and commitment to programmatic goals developed by a broadly based safe schools committee.
  2. A district-wide statement of philosophy, an enabling policy, and guidelines that serve as a foundation for safe school plans created by individual schools, provide a clear sense of purpose, and exemplify district support for the entire planning process.
  3. An assessment of the incidence of campus violence and vandalism, student behavior referrals resulting in suspensions or expulsions, student behaviors resulting in automatic expulsion, and students' attendance patterns including actual attendance, number of excused and unexcused absences, and reasons for nonattendance and tardiness.
  4. Identification of appropriate and comprehensive strategies and programs that will provide or maintain a high level of school safety.
  5. A discipline policy that clearly defines expected behavior, provides consequences for deviations from the expected behavior, and distinguishes discipline problems from law enforcement problems. A discipline policy should provide details on the following:
  1. Objectives and strategies to improve school safety, attendance, student behavior, and disciplinary practices, and thereby reduce campus violence and foster a positive learning environment.
  2. An evaluation of the effectiveness of the designated strategies in reaching the desired attendance, behavior, and school environment goals.
  3. A description of the roles and responsibilities of faculty and staff in developing cooperative working relationships with law enforcement agencies, service agencies, parents (guardians), and students to assure the implementation and continuing progress of the comprehensive plan.
  4. A description of the identified fiscal and personnel resources for the plan's implementation.
  5. Strategies for recognizing situations that may potentially result in conflict (or otherwise be disruptive of education) and implementing appropriate interventions.

1 Constitution of the State of California, Article 1, Section 28(c), Right to Safe Schools.
2 The Carl Washington School Safety and Violence Prevention Act, Education Code Section 32228 et seq.
3 California Department of Education, Safe Schools: A Planning Guide for Action (1995 Edition)
4 Pursuant to Education Code Sections 35294.1 and 35294.2, the school site council is responsible for developing the school site safety plan or for delegating the responsibility to a school safety planning committee. The site council shall consult with law enforcement in the writing and development of the plan, as well as consult, cooperate, and coordinate with other school site councils and safety committees, where practical.
5 Resnic, Michael and Richard Udry. Protecting adolescents from harm: Findings from the National Longitudinal Study on Adolescent Health. JAMA 278 (10). September 10, 1997.

PDF Version Policy #01-02 - School Safety, Discipline, and Attendance (PDF; 102KB; 4pp.)

Questions: State Board of Education | 916-319-0827 
Download Free Readers