Skip to content
Printer-friendly version

Frequently Asked Questions - SACS

Frequently asked questions regarding standardized account code structure (SACS) financial reporting.
Education Protection Account
  1. Have unique account codes been established for the Proposition 30 Education Protection Account (EPA) entitlement?
  2. When will the EPA code combinations be available in the SACS tables of valid code combinations?
  3. How should the adjustment of the EPA entitlement from P-2 to Annual be recorded?
  4. How should LEAs record EPA expenditures? Since the EPA entitlement merely replaces state aid funds that have always been reported in Resource 0000, is it appropriate to accumulate the costs in Resource 0000 and then make a direct cost transfer from Resource 0000 to Resource 1400?  
  5. Must expenditures of EPA funds be charged directly to the EPA resource at the time of expenditure, or may periodic or annual adjusting entries be made between another resource and Resource 1400?
  6. Can EPA funds be transferred to other resources?
  7. Can contributions from other resources (funding sources) be made to Resource 1400?
  8. Can EPA funds be carried over into the following year?
  9. Must the EPA entitlement be allocated proportionately to the programs whose ADA generates the LEA’s revenue limit funding?
  10. Proposition 30 specifies that LEAs may not use EPA funds for salaries or benefits of administrators or any other administrative costs. What is the definition of administrative costs?
  11. Specifically, for what types of activities may EPA funds be used?
  12. May EPA funds be used for indirect costs?
  13. Will the CDE provide a template that LEAs can use for reporting EPA revenues and expenditures?
  14. Proposition 30 requires that the use of EPA funds be determined by the governing board at an open public meeting. Does this meeting need to be a separate meeting only for the discussion of EPA funding?
  15. When should the open public meeting for discussing the use of 2012–13 EPA Funding be held?
  16. Will the CDE provide guidance or sample language for a governing board’s approval of the use of EPA funds at an open public meeting?  
  17. What are some example journal entries?
  18. Can the charter school 1% supervisorial oversight fee be charged on EPA funds?
  19. Has the CDE provided any additional EPA information?

  1. Have unique account codes been established for the Proposition 30 Education Protection Account (EPA) entitlement?

    Yes, standardized account code structure (SACS) Resource 1400, Education Protection Account, and revenue Object 8012, Education Protection Account Entitlement, have been established. These codes are required to be used by all local educational agencies, including charter schools, receiving EPA funds.

    Charter schools reporting financial data via the Alternative Form, which does not contain resource codes, should use Object 8012 to record the EPA entitlement.

  2. When will the EPA code combinations be available in the SACS tables of valid code combinations?

    The EPA code combinations will be available the beginning of April 2013, which is after the second interim reporting due date. This is because in the SACS software for fiscal year 2012–13, there is no line in the interim reporting fund forms into which the amount reported in Object 8012 could extract.

    As a workaround, LEAs that wish to report EPA revenue for second interim can include EPA revenue temporarily in Object 8011, Revenue Limit State Aid – Current Year, and then reclassify the EPA revenue to Resource 1400, Object 8012 during year-end closing.

  3. How should the adjustment of the EPA entitlement from P-2 to Annual be recorded?

    Any amount received in the current year that was not accrued in the prior year should be recorded to Resource 1400 using Object 8019, Revenue Limit State Aid – Prior Years.

    Charter schools reporting financial data via the Alternative Form should use Object 8019.

  4. How should LEAs record EPA expenditures? Since the EPA entitlement merely replaces state aid funds that have always been reported in Resource 0000, is it appropriate to accumulate the costs in Resource 0000 and then make a direct cost transfer from Resource 0000 to Resource 1400?  

    EPA expenditures should be reported in Resource 1400 using the actual expenditure account lines where feasible, and not lump-sum transferred using Object 5710, Transfers of Direct Costs. The intention of the EPA reporting requirement is transparency. Reporting actual expenditure items achieves this better than a lump-sum transfer. The use of a unique resource code facilitates this transparency in the LEA’s accounting records.

  5. Must expenditures of EPA funds be charged directly to the EPA resource at the time of expenditure, or may periodic or annual adjusting entries be made between another resource and Resource 1400?

    It is appropriate to record periodic adjusting entries between another resource and Resource 1400. However, as mentioned previously, the entries should be made using the actual expenditure account lines and not as a lump-sum direct cost transfer.

Back to top

  1. Can EPA funds be transferred to other resources?

    Allowable expenditures should be recorded directly to EPA Resource 1400 to the extent possible. The CDE expects that school districts and charter schools incur sufficient unrestricted educational expenditures that should allow for easily identifying amounts to be reported in Resource 1400.

    However, due to the unique characteristics of county offices of education (COEs) in that their principal instructional programs are typically reported as restricted and they may operate many other programs on a fee for service model, it may be necessary for COEs to transfer EPA funds to other resources in order to keep program accounting intact.

    One example is a COE whose only instructional program is a community school that is reported using Resource 2400, Juvenile Court/County Community Schools. In order to avoid splitting community school expenditures between two resource codes, especially when the program revenue has historically been a revenue limit transfer from Resource 0000 and where now reporting the related EPA revenues and expenditures separately would be inconsistent with past practice, this COE might transfer EPA funds to this revenue limit funded program using Object 8091, Revenue Limit Transfers – Current Year.

    Another example is an excess tax COE that historically has operated a program on behalf of school districts on a fee for service basis. This COE may decide to use its new minimum $200 per ADA EPA entitlement towards the cost of running the program, thus enabling them to charge less to participating school districts. Although the program is partially funded with unrestricted revenues, the COE may want to keep expenditures together in order to determine the charges for services.

  2. Can contributions from other resources (funding sources) be made to Resource 1400?

    No. Because LEAs have a legal requirement to report the receipt and use of EPA funds, contributions to Resource 1400 from other resources would distort EPA expenditures and not result in the intended reporting transparency. Also note that the EPA is not a “program,” in the sense that it is not “a group of related activities that operate together to accomplish specific purposes or objectives.” The normal reason for recording a contribution to a program is to keep program expenditures together, which does not apply in this context. Therefore, contributions from other funding sources should not be made to Resource 1400.

  3. Can EPA funds be carried over into the following year?

    Proposition 30 does not restrict the amount of EPA funds that may be carried over. As a practical matter, though, most EPA funds probably will be expended each year.

  4. Must the EPA entitlement be allocated proportionately to the programs whose ADA generates the LEA’s revenue limit funding?

    No. LEAs may allocate the EPA entitlement entirely to one program for expenditure. For example, a school district may allocate it entirely to the regular education program, and county offices of education may allocate it entirely to the Juvenile Court School program.

Back to top

  1. Proposition 30 specifies that LEAs may not use EPA funds for salaries or benefits of administrators or any other administrative costs. What is the definition of administrative costs?

    The CDE has interpreted that administrative costs, as used in Proposition 30, means anything defined as administration in the California School Accounting Manual. Administrative costs include general administration, school administration, and instructional administration:

    • General administration refers to agency-wide administrative activities including governing board, superintendent, and district-level fiscal, personnel, and central support services.
    • School administration refers to activities concerned with directing and managing the operation of a particular school.
    • Instructional administration refers to activities for assisting instructional staff in planning, developing, and evaluating the process of providing learning experiences for students.

    The CDE has determined that expenditures by county offices of education for certain administrative activities they are required to perform on behalf of the school districts within the county are not administrative costs for purposes of Proposition 30. These expenditures are separately identifiable within the county office's financial reports.

    The CDE believes that defining administration at the functional level, rather than by specific items of expenditure, will make it easier for LEAs to identify costs that may be charged to EPA. Furthermore, the CDE is confident that LEAs incur a sufficient level of non-administrative costs, e.g., instruction and pupil services, to easily meet the intent of Proposition 30 to not use EPA funding for administrative costs.

Back to top

  1. Specifically, for what types of activities may EPA funds be used?

    Except as provided below for COEs, the following tables of SACS functions show the activities for which EPA funds may and may not be used:

    1000–1999    INSTRUCTION

    SACS Function

    Chargeable to EPA?

    1000   Instruction
    Yes
    1110   Special Education: Separate Classes
    Yes
    1120   Special Education: Resource Specialist Instruction
    Yes
    1130   Special Education: Supplemental Aids and Services in Regular Classrooms
    Yes
    1180   Special Education: Nonpublic Agencies/Schools
    Yes
    1190   Special Education: Other Specialized Instructional Services
    Yes

    2000–2999    INSTRUCTION-RELATED SERVICES

    SACS Function

    Chargeable to EPA?

    2100   Instructional Supervision and Administration

    No

    2110   Instructional Supervision (optional)

    No

    2120   Instructional Research (optional)

    No

    2130   Curriculum Development (optional)

    No

    2140   In-house Instructional Staff Development (optional)

    No

    2150   Instructional Administration of Special Projects (optional)

    No

    2200   Administrative Unit (AU) of a Multidistrict SELPA

    No

    2420   Instructional Library, Media, and Technology

    Yes

    2490   Other Instructional Resources

    Yes

    2495   Parent Participation (optional)

    Yes

    2700   School Administration

    No


    3000–3999    PUPIL SERVICES

    SACS Function

    Chargeable to EPA?

    3110   Guidance and Counseling Services

    Yes

    3120   Psychological Services

    Yes

    3130   Attendance and Social Work Services

    Yes

    3140   Health Services

    Yes

    3150   Speech Pathology and Audiology Services

    Yes

    3160   Pupil Testing Services

    Yes

    3600   Pupil Transportation

    Yes

    3700   Food Services

    Yes

    3900   Other Pupil Services

    Yes


    4000–4999   ANCILLARY SERVICES

    SACS Function

    Chargeable to EPA?

    4000   Ancillary Services

    Yes

    4100   School-Sponsored Co-curricular (optional)

    Yes

    4200   School-Sponsored Athletics (optional)

    Yes

    4900   Other Ancillary Services (optional)

    Yes


    5000–5999   COMMUNITY SERVICES

    SACS Function

    Chargeable to EPA?

    5000   Community Services

    Yes

    5100   Community Recreation (optional)

    Yes

    5400   Civic Services (optional)

    Yes

    5900   Other Community Services (optional)

    Yes


    6000–6999    ENTERPRISE

    SACS Function

    Chargeable to EPA?

    6000   Enterprise

    No


    7000–7999    GENERAL ADMINISTRATION

    SACS Function

    Chargeable to EPA?

    7100   Board and Superintendent

    No

    7110   Board

    No

    7120   Staff Relations and Negotiations (optional)

    No

    7150   Superintendent (optional)

    No

    7180   Public Information (optional)

    No

    7190   External Financial Audit—Single Audit

    No

    7191   External Financial Audit—Other

    No

    7200   Other General Administration

    No

    7210   Indirect Cost Transfers

    No

    7300   Fiscal Services (optional)

    No

    7310   Budgeting (optional)

    No

    7320   Accounts Receivable (optional)

    No

    7330   Accounts Payable (optional)

    No

    7340   Payroll (optional)

    No

    7350   Financial Accounting (optional)

    No

    7360   Project-Specific Accounting (optional)

    No

    7370   Internal Auditing (optional)

    No

    7380   Property Accounting (optional)

    No

    7390   Other Fiscal Services (optional)

    No

    7400   Personnel/Human Resources Services (optional)

    No

    7410   Staff Development (optional)

    No

    7430   Credentials (optional)

    No

    7490   Other Personnel/Human Resources Services (optional)

    No

    7500   Central Support (optional)

    No

    7510   Planning, Research, Development, and Evaluation (optional)

    No

    7530   Purchasing (optional)

    No

    7540   Warehousing and Distribution (optional)

    No

    7550   Printing, Publishing, and Duplicating (optional)

    No

    7600   All Other General Administration (optional)

    No

    7700   Centralized Data Processing

    No


    8000–8999    PLANT SERVICES

    SACS Function

    Chargeable to EPA?

    8100   Plant Maintenance and Operations

    Yes

    8110   Maintenance (optional)

    Yes

    8200   Operations (optional)

    Yes

    8300   Security (optional)

    Yes

    8400   Other Plant Maintenance and Operations (optional)

    Yes

    8500   Facilities Acquisition and Construction

    Yes

    8700   Facilities Rents and Leases

    Yes


    9000–9999    OTHER OUTGO

    SACS Function

    Chargeable to EPA?

    9100   Debt Service

    Yes

    9200   Transfers Between Agencies

    Yes


    County Office of Education only

    SACS Goal Chargeable to EPA?
    8600 County Services to Districts (without regard to function)
    Yes

Back to top

  1. May EPA funds be used for indirect costs?

    Indirect costs are not an allowable use of EPA funds because they are primarily administrative costs.

  2. Will the CDE provide a template that LEAs can use for reporting EPA revenues and expenditures?

    Proposition 30 did not prescribe a format for LEAs to report their receipt and expenditure of EPA funds, nor did it require the CDE to develop a format. Therefore, the CDE will not be providing a template. It will be at an LEA’s discretion to determine the format for reporting its EPA revenue and expenditures on its Web site.

  3. Proposition 30 requires that the use of EPA funds be determined by the governing board at an open public meeting. Does this meeting need to be a separate meeting only for the discussion of EPA funding?

    Proposition 30 language does not specify that the open public meeting has to be a separately held meeting. Therefore, this requirement may be satisfied at a regularly scheduled meeting, which the CDE believes could be the annual budget adoption meeting.

  4. When should the open public meeting for discussing the use of 2012–13 EPA Funding be held?

    Most likely this will be the meeting at which the second interim report is presented, although it could be at any open public meeting before expenditures are recorded for 2012–13.

  5. Will the CDE provide guidance or sample language for a governing board’s approval of the use of EPA funds at an open public meeting?  

    No. Proposition 30 did not prescribe the format that the governing board’s approval of the use of EPA funding must take, and did not require the CDE to develop a format. Therefore, it will be at an LEA’s discretion to determine the appropriate approval format, based on local governing board policies.

Back to top

  1. What are some example journal entries?

    a. The local educational agency (LEA) records receipt of its 2012-13 EPA entitlement in June 2013.

    Debit (Dr)/ Credit (Cr)

    Fund

    Resource

    Project Year

    Goal

    Function

    Object

    Amount

    Cr

    01

    1400

    0

    0000

    0000

    8012

    $10,000


    b. For 2012-13, the school district reclassifies $10,000 of instructional expenditures (teacher salaries and benefits) originally accumulated in Resource 0000 to Resource 1400, according to the spending determination made by the governing board.

    Dr/Cr Fund Resource Project Year Goal Function Object Amount
    Dr
    01
    1400
    0

    1110

    1000

    1100

    $7,000

    Dr

    01

    1400

    0

    1110

    1000

    3101

    $1,000

    Dr

    01

    1400

    0

    1110

    1000

    3401

    $   700

    Dr

    01

    1400

    0

    1110

    1000

    3501

    $   600

    Dr

    01

    1400

    0

    1110

    1000

    3601

    $   400

    Dr

    01

    1400

    0

    1110

    1000

    3801

    $   300

    Cr

    01

    0000

    0

    1110

    1000

    1100

    $7,000

    Cr

    01

    0000

    0

    1110

    1000

    3101

    $1,000

    Cr

    01

    0000

    0

    1110

    1000

    3401

    $   700

    Cr

    01

    0000

    0

    1110

    1000

    3501

    $   600

    Cr

    01

    0000

    0

    1110

    1000

    3601

    $   400

    Cr

    01

    0000

    0

    1110

    1000

    3801

    $   300


    c. The LEA records receipt of its 2013-14 EPA entitlement.

    Dr/Cr

    Fund

    Resource

    Project Year

    Goal

    Function

    Object

    Amount

    Cr

    01

    1400

    0

    0000

    0000

    8012

    $9,000



    d. The LEA records receipt of its 2012-13 EPA entitlement adjustment, based on 2012-13 Annual apportionment (assumes the amount was not accrued in 2012-13).

    Dr/Cr

    Fund

    Resource

    Project Year

    Goal

    Function

    Object

    Amount

    Cr

    01

    1400

    0

    0000

    0000

    8019

    $2,000


    e. For 2013-14, the school district reclassifies $11,000 of instructional expenditures (teacher salaries and benefits) originally accumulated in Resource 0000 to Resource 1400, according to the spending determination made by the governing board. (Note that an LEA could instead charge expenditures directly to EPA from the beginning.)

    Dr/Cr

    Fund

    Resource

    Project Year

    Goal

    Function

    Object

    Amount

    Dr

    01

    1400

    0

    1110

    1000

    1100

    $7,000

    Dr

    01

    1400

    0

    1110

    1000

    3101

    $1,000

    Dr

    01

    1400

    0

    1110

    1000

    3401

    $   700

    Dr

    01

    1400

    0

    1110

    1000

    3501

    $   600

    Dr

    01

    1400

    0

    1110

    1000

    3601

    $   400

    Dr

    01

    1400

    0

    1110

    1000

    3801

    $   300

    Cr

    01

    0000

    0

    1110

    1000

    1100

    $7,000

    Cr

    01

    0000

    0

    1110

    1000

    3101

    $1,000

    Cr

    01

    0000

    0

    1110

    1000

    3401

    $   700

    Cr

    01

    0000

    0

    1110

    1000

    3501

    $   600

    Cr

    01

    0000

    0

    1110

    1000

    3601

    $   400

    Cr

    01

    0000

    0

    1110

    1000

    3801

    $   300


    Examples specific to county offices of education (COEs)

    f. The COE determines that it will use its EPA entitlement for the instructional expenditures of its community schools program. EPA funds are transferred to the Juvenile Court/County Community Schools resource. 

    Dr/Cr

    Fund

    Resource

    Project Year

    Goal

    Function

    Object

    Amount

    Dr

    01

    1400

    0

    0000

    0000

    8091

    $15,000

    Cr

    01

    2400

    0

    0000

    0000

    8091

    $15,000


    g. An excess tax COE determines that it will use its EPA entitlement to fund some of the costs of a program that it operates on a fee-for-service basis on behalf of school districts. The program incurs costs that are allowed to be charged to EPA. In this case, the program is funded with unrestricted revenues. Therefore, EPA funds are transferred to the unrestricted resource.

    Dr/Cr

    Fund

    Resource

    Project Year

    Goal

    Function

    Object

    Amount

    Dr

    01

    1400

    0

    0000

    0000

    8091

    $15,000

    Cr

    01

    0000

    0

    0000

    0000

    8091

    $15,000


    NOTE: If EPA funds are transferred out of Resource 1400 then the LEA should keep local accounting records to document that the EPA funds have been spent for non-administrative costs for purposes of the reporting requirement and the annual audit.

  2. Can the charter school 1% supervisorial oversight fee be charged on EPA funds?

    Yes. Pursuant to Education Code (EC) sections 47613 and 47632, the amount that can be charged for the charter supervisorial oversight fee is based on revenues which, for purposes of calculating the oversight fee, is defined as general-purpose entitlement and categorical block grant funding. Proposition 30 did not change the definition of those revenues or the calculation for the general purpose entitlement; rather, it changed where the funds for general purpose entitlement will come from. Specifically, part will come from the EPA and part will come from state aid (EC Section 47633).

    For information on whether EPA funds may be used to pay the supervisorial oversight fee, see question 10.

  3. Has the CDE provided any additional EPA information?

    Yes, additional EPA information [http://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/aa/pa/epa.asp] is available on the CDE Web site.

Back to top

Questions:   Financial Accountability & Information Services | sacsinfo@cde.ca.gov | 916-322-1770
Download Free Readers