Skip to main content
California Department of Education Logo

RTT-ELC QRIS Evaluation RFP Addendum 1

Addendum Number 1 to the Race to the Top-Early Learning Challenge (RTT-ELC) Quality Rating and Improvement System, 2012-2015, RFP.

October 11, 2013

ADDENDUM #1
Request for Proposal (RFP)
Independent Evaluation of California’s Race to the Top, Early Learning Challenge–Quality Rating and Improvement System, 2012-2015

To all Prospective Bidders:

Please use this addendum to update your copy of the RFP. This addendum hereby revises RFP CN130254, as follows:

  • Page 17, Section 2.2

    Delete text in research question #1:

    “RTT-ELC”

    Replace text in research question #1 with:
    “QRIS”
  • Page 12, Section 2
    On page 12 add paragraph at the end of the page:

    "RTT-ELC common data elements tables are still drafts. The 2013 data will be available after the March 3, 2014 due date. The 2014 data will be available after the March 2, 2015 due date. The 2015 data will be available after the March 1, 2016 due date".
  • Page 17, Section 2.2

    Delete text in research question #8:

    “quality improvement elements”

    Replace text in research question #8:
    “quality improvement activities”
  • Page 18, Deliverables, Section 2.2

    Delete date:

    “December 31, 2015”

    Insert Date:
    “December 15, 2015”
  • Page 20, Section 3.3

    Delete date:

    “December 31, 2015”

    Insert Date:
    “December 15, 2015”
  • Page 33, Task 2.2 Deliverables

    Delete date:

    “December 31, 2015”

    Insert Date:
    “December 15, 2015”
  • Attachment 16, Exhibit A, page 7, Section 3.3 last paragraph

    Delete date:

    “December 31, 2015”

    Insert Date:
    “December 15, 2015”
  • Attachment 16, Exhibit A, page 5, Task 2.2

    Delete date:

    “December 31, 2015”

    Insert Date:
    “December 15, 2015”
  • Page 15, Section 3 Scope of Work, Task 1

    Insert Task 1.5 paragraph

    “1.5 Conduct a Literature Review of Quality Rating Improvement Systems Evaluations.  The proposal must describe the plan for locating relevant literature, using multiple resources, and evaluating the content of the located literature.  The bidder must describe how they will synthesize the knowledge gained from the literature and utilize it to guide the descriptive study”.
  • Attachment 16, page 2

    Insert paragraph #8

    “Conduct a Literature Review of Quality Rating Improvement Systems Evaluations.  The proposal must describe the plan for locating relevant literature, using multiple resources, and evaluating the content of the located literature.  The bidder must describe how they will synthesize the knowledge gained from the literature and utilize it to guide the descriptive study”.
Questions:   Channa Hewawickrama | chewawickrama@cde.ca.gov | 916-323-3034
Last Reviewed: Monday, February 2, 2015

Share this Page

Related Content

Recently Posted in

  • ASES Frontier Transportation Grant 2016-17 (added 09-Feb-2016)
    Intent to Award list for the ASES 2016-17 transportation grant.
  • Res-14: Prop 39 CCEJA (updated 08-Feb-2016)
    Proposition 39 - California Clean Energy Jobs Act program entitlements, apportionments, and letters detailing funding information for fiscal year 2014-15.
  • DSPT Funding Results FY 2015-16 (updated 08-Feb-2016)
    Direct Support Professional Training (DSPT) Funding Results.
  • Res-13: Prop 39 CCEJA (updated 08-Feb-2016)
    Proposition 39 - California Clean Energy Jobs Act program entitlements, apportionments, and letters detailing funding information for fiscal year 2013-14.
  • FY 2015-16 Infant-Toddler QRIS Block Grant RFA (updated 08-Feb-2016)
    Request for Applications for the fiscal year 2015-16 Infant-Toddler Quality Rating Improvement System (QRIS) Block Grant Program.