Goal
The goal of the K-3 Class Size Reduction (CSR) Program is to increase student achievement, particularly in reading and mathematics, by decreasing the size of K-3 classes to 20 or fewer students per certificated teacher.
Legal References
California Education Code sections 52120 - 52128.5
Funding Levels
The CSR Program (Chapter 163, Statutes of 1996) and the CSR Facilities Funding Program (Chapter 164, Statutes of 1996) represent the single largest appropriation ever -- nearly one billion dollars for the initial year -- for educational reform. In 1996-97, $771 million was allocated for operation costs (hiring teachers) and $200 million was allocated separately for school facilities to districts that implemented CSR. To fully implement, the CSR Program requires an annual allocation of approximately $1.7 billion. In 1996-97, school districts received $650 for each pupil enrolled in a class of 20 or fewer in grades K-3 (only three grade levels per school could participate in the first year). Districts operating a half-day program of smaller classes received $325 per pupil. In 1997-98, school districts received $800 per pupil for the full day program (Option One) and $400 per pupil for the half-day program (Option Two). The law now provides an annual increase equivalent to the statutory cost of living allowance. In 2004-05, school districts receive $928 per pupil in an Option One class and $464 per pupil in an Option Two class.
Basic Program Requirements
The CSR Program is a voluntary program. The state provides per pupil funding for each child in grades K-3 who receives instruction in a class of 20 or fewer pupils. The program has two options. Option One provides full funding for pupils who receive the 20-to-1 instruction all day and Option Two provides half funding for pupils who receive the 20-to-1 instruction for half of the instructional minutes per day. All pupils must receive this instruction from a certificated teacher, not an instructional aide. Each CSR class must be in a separate, self-contained classroom or the equivalent square footage provided before CSR. Although classes may occasionally exceed 20 pupils without penalty, in order to receive funding each class must maintain an average of 20.4 pupils or less.
Participation Data
1996-97 - 839 districts participated (94%) - 56 districts did not participate
| Grade | Pupils |
Percentage | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kindergarten | 64,779 pupils |
(14%) |
in 3,736 classes |
| Grade 1 | 428,242 pupils |
(88%) |
in 22,533 classes |
| Grade 2 | 262,074 pupils |
(57%) |
in 13,831 classes |
| Grade 3 | 79,062 pupils |
(18%) |
in 4,223 classes |
| Combination Classes | 121,176 pupils | N/A | in 7,289 classes |
1997-98 - 875 districts participated (98%) - 20 districts did not participate
| Grade | Pupils |
Percentage | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kindergarten | 321,209 pupils |
(69%) |
in 18,098 classes |
| Grade 1 | 484,518 pupils |
(99%) |
in 22,004 classes |
| Grade 2 | 468,103 pupils |
(96%) |
in 20,622 classes |
| Grade 3 | 309,828 pupils |
(67%) |
in 14,226 classes |
| Combination Classes | 8,085 pupils |
N/A |
in 11,166 classes |
1998-99 - 883 districts participated (99%) - 13 districts did not participate
| Grade | Pupils |
Percentage | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kindergarten | 393,036 pupils |
(86%) |
in 20,327 classes |
| Grade 1 | 483,714 pupils |
(99%) |
in 22,021 classes |
| Grade 2 | 475,477 pupils |
(98%) |
in 20,932 classes |
| Grade 3 | 410,089 pupils |
(84%) |
in 19,000 classes |
| Combination Classes | 8,681 pupils |
N/A |
in 12,213 classes |
1999-00 - 886 districts participated (99%) - 9 districts did not participate
| Grade | Pupils |
Percentage | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kindergarten | 439,439 pupils |
(96%) |
in 22,486 classes |
| Grade 1 | 480,307 pupils |
(99%) |
in 22,229 classes |
| Grade 2 | 475,702 pupils |
(97%) |
in 21,399 classes |
| Grade 3 | 458,040 pupils |
(91%) |
in 21,617 classes |
| Combination Classes | 8,989 pupils |
N/A |
in 11,093 classes |
2000-01 - 886 districts participated (99%) - 9 districts did not participate
| Grade | Pupils |
Percentage | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kindergarten | 439,439 pupils | (96%)
|
in 22,486 classes |
| Grade 1 | 480,307 pupils | (99%)
|
in 22,229 classes |
| Grade 2 | 475,702 pupils | (97%)
|
in 21,399 classes |
| Grade 3 | 458,040 pupils | (91%)
|
in 21,617 classes |
| Combination Classes | 8,989 pupils | N/A | in 11,093 classes |
2001-02 - 881 districts participated (99%) - 6 districts did not participate
| Grade | Pupils |
Percentage | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kindergarten | 436,647 pupils | (96%)
|
in 21,999 classes |
| Grade 1 | 480,416 pupils | (98%)
|
in 22,028 classes |
| Grade 2 | 477,350 pupils | (97%)
|
in 21,555 classes |
| Grade 3 | 451,030 pupils | (92%)
|
in 21,209 classes |
| Combination Classes | 8,233 pupils | N/A | in 11,741 classes |
2002-03 - 886 districts participated (99%) - 7 districts did not participate
| Grade | Pupils |
Percentage | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kindergarten | 430,403 pupils |
(94%) |
in 22,245 classes |
| Grade 1 | 472,968 pupils |
(97%) |
in 22,311 classes |
| Grade 2 | 477,398 pupils |
(98%) |
in 22,519 classes |
| Grade 3 | 458,873 pupils |
(93%) |
in 22,364 classes |
| Combination Classes | 7,559 pupils |
N/A | in 8,671 classes |
2003-04 - 895 districts participated (99%) - 13 districts did not participate
| Grade | Pupils |
Percentage | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kindergarten | 429,038 pupils |
(94%) |
in 22,594 classes |
| Grade 1 | 464,685 pupils |
(97%) |
in 22,048 classes |
| Grade 2 | 462,385 pupils |
(96%) |
in 21,720 classes |
| Grade 3 | 423,456 pupils |
(86%) |
in 20,649 classes |
| Combination Classes | 5,729 pupils |
N/A |
in 7,756 classes |
2004-05 - 891 districts participated (99%) - 10 districts did not participate
| Grade | Pupils |
Percentage | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kindergarten | 427,891 pupils |
(94%) |
in 22,729 classes |
| Grade 1 | 460,934 pupils |
(97%) |
in 22,203 classes |
| Grade 2 | 452,560 pupils |
(95%) |
in 21,635 classes |
| Grade 3 | 416,585 pupils |
(87%) |
in 20,562 classes |
| Combination Classes | 4,875 pupils |
N/A |
in 6,915 classes |
2005-06 - 882 districts participated (99%) - 8 districts did not participate
| Grade | Pupils |
Percentage | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kindergarten | 423,508 pupils |
(100%) |
in 22,500 classes |
| Grade 1 | 463,586 pupils |
(106%) |
in 22,696 classes |
| Grade 2 | 447,152 pupils |
(103%) |
in 21,612 classes |
| Grade 3 | 407,979 pupils |
(94%) |
in 20,268 classes |
| Combination Classes | 4,194 pupils |
N/A |
in 6,520 classes |
2006-07 - 877 districts participated (99%) - 10 districts did not participate
| Grade | Pupils |
Percentage | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kindergarten | 417,994 pupils |
(92%) |
in 22,317 classes |
| Grade 1 | 458,421 pupils |
(96%) |
in 22,587 classes |
| Grade 2 | 440,467 pupils |
(95%) |
in 21,455 classes |
| Grade 3 | 403,590 pupils |
(86%) |
in 20,207 classes |
| Combination Classes | 3,552 pupils |
N/A |
in 5,997 classes |
Facilities Data
1996-97
- 13,689 teaching stations were funded @ $25,000 each = $342,225,000
- An additional $577,500 was allocated to eligible school districts to accommodate snow load requirements for 154 of these teaching stations
1997-98
- 4,717 teaching stations were funded @$40,000 each = $188,680,000
- A second round of 1997-98 funding from Assembly Bill 1746 (Escutia) and Proposition 1A funded 1,845 stations @ $40,000 each = $73,800,000
- $49,148,438 for severely overcrowded districts was approved by the State Board of Education for the Multitrack Year-Round Education (MTYRE) Waiver authorized under Assembly BIll 751 (Escutia). Funding for these districts was authorized under Assembly Bill 1746
1998-99
- 1,663 teaching stations were funded @ $40,000 each = $66,520,000
- A second round of 1998-99 funding from Proposition 1A funded 2,196 teaching stations @ $40,000 each = $87,840,000
Class Size Reduction Evaluation
The California Department of Education (CDE) awarded the contract
for the statewide evaluation of the K-3 CSR Program to the CSR
Research Consortium
. The partnership is led by the American
Institutes for Research
(AIR) and the RAND
Corporation
. It includes as subcontractors Policy
Analysis for California Education
(PACE), WestEd
,
and EdSource
.
The California
Educational Research Cooperative at the University of California,
Riverside also collaborated on this research project. The evaluation
was mandated by Senate Bill 1777, the legislation that authorized
the CSR Program, and is based on a research plan adopted by the
State Board of Education in November 1997.
The evaluation was conducted over four years beginning in May 1998 and ending with a report to the Governor and legislature in June 2002. The research team employed a variety of data gathering methods. These include surveys of district administrators, school principals, teachers, and parents; in-class observations of reduced and non-reduced classes; use of standard test scores; and administration of supplemental tests of reading for first grade students. The team also used existing data including SABE/2 scores (a Spanish language test of educational achievement) from a sample of districts with large proportions of Spanish speaking students, and the CSR database and California Basic Education Data System (CBEDS) data files from the CDE.
The first annual report of the CSR Program was released in June 1999.