Skip to main content
California Department of Education Logo

Contra Costa Times Your Turn

Times Editorial was Wrong about State's Education Moves. Editorial response by State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson, published on December 16, 2011.

Ignoring the price tag doesn't make it free.

While every Christmas shopper understands this simple truth, the Times unfortunately ignored it in its recent offhand look at education issues facing California.

First, it concluded that our state should join the 11 others that have applied for a waiver from the federal No Child Left Behind law, to provide schools with "the flexibility educators have been seeking."

Unfortunately, what strikes the Times as flexibility comes wrapped in nearly 100 pages of federal red tape, spelling out nearly a dozen new mandates that would cost between $2 billion and $3 billion to carry out—without a dollar of new resources.

Who among us believes—with a financial emergency facing our schools—that now is the time to undertake elaborate and often unproven programs dictated by Washington, the very people who gave us No Child Left Behind in the first place?

Not the state PTA. Not business leaders. Not school administrators. Not teachers.

The same one-sided analysis holds true for the Times' lament about the rejection of California's recent application for federal Race to the Top round three funding.

While I strongly disagree with some of the policies embedded in this program, I signed on to California's application because I was ready to set those concerns aside to let local school district efforts proceed.

The state's fiscal situation, however, required that our application shield other districts—as well as the state itself—from the costs of committing to new programs. However, federal bureaucrats would have none of it, rejecting our application out of hand.

They did so because we would not commit to a one-size-fits-all model for improving schools, or dictating and paying for an overhaul of the systems used to evaluate teachers at all 10,000 California schools.

Developing and implementing the new evaluation systems alone would cost roughly $480 million—10 times the entire amount Washington was prepared to award.

It's unfortunate that the seven school districts that have embraced all elements of this program won't get a share of these dollars. Together, they represent nearly 1 million students—more than several of the states now in line for these funds.

But bowing to federal demands would have shifted significant new costs elsewhere—including to more than 5 million students attending other California schools that would have gotten nothing in the bargain.

The Times seems to have forgotten its previous positions opposing "unfunded mandates." The people of California voted into our constitution a prohibition of such top-down cost shifts, which means that the governor and I could not impose the federal edicts on local schools without paying for them through other cuts in the state education budget.

The unstated but inevitable consequence of the Times' stand? A new round of school closures and teacher layoffs. Sounds more like a road to nowhere than a Race to the Top.

Tom Torlakson is the state superintendent of public instruction.

Questions: Communications Division | communications@cde.ca.gov | 916-319-0818 
Last Reviewed: Thursday, June 4, 2015

Share this Page

Recently Posted in Editorials & Letters

  • Environmental Education Grant Program (added 08-Feb-2016)
    Letter to County and District Superintendents and Charter School Administrators regarding the Environmental Education Grant Program Request for Application.
  • Election Information (added 05-Feb-2016)
    Letter to County and District Superintendents, Charter School Administrators, and School Principals regarding 2016 presidential election information.
  • Assembly Bill 2160: Submitting GPAs for Cal Grants (added 29-Jan-2016)
    Letter to County and District Superintendents, Charter School Administrators, and High School Principals regarding the implementation of Assembly Bill 2160, also known as the "Ting Bill".
  • 2016 Classified School Employees of the Year (added 15-Jan-2016)
    Letter to District and County Superintendents and Charter School Administrators regarding the 2016 Classified School Employees of the Year Program.
  • California Mathematics Placement Act of 2015 (added 15-Jan-2016)
    Letter to County and District Superintendents and Charter School Administrators regarding implementing the California Mathematics Placement Act of 2015.

  • Subject Matter Verification Process (added 15-Jan-2016)
    Letter to County and District Superintendents and Charter School Administrators regarding the California Subject Matter Verification Process for Secondary Teachers in Special Settings Guidebook.
  • Every Student Succeeds Act (added 15-Jan-2016)
    Letter to County and District Superintendents and Charter School Administrators regarding the newly enacted Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA).
  • Every Student Succeeds Act (added 13-Jan-2016)
    Letter to U.S. Department of Education regarding the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA).
  • Free Mental Health First Aid Training Available (added 06-Jan-2016)
    Letter to County and District Superintendents and Charter School Administrators regarding an opportunity to provide mental health training to school staff at no cost to any county office of education, district, or charter school.
  • New Funding To Increase Educator Quality (added 23-Dec-2015)
    Letter to County and District Superintendents and Direct-Funded Charter School Administrators regarding new funding to increase educator quality.