Skip to content
California Department of Education News Release
Release: # 07-98
August 15, 2007
Contact: Pam Slater
E-mail: communications@cde.ca.gov
Phone: 916-319-0818

State Superintendent Jack O'Connell Releases 2007 STAR
Results Showing Encouraging, Troubling Trends

INGLEWOOD/SAN DIEGO — State Superintendent of Public Instruction Jack O'Connell today released the results of the 2007 Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Program that show California students are continuing to improve academically in most subjects and grades.

"This year's results offer both encouragement and reason for serious concern," O'Connell said. "We can be pleased that gains in student achievement made over the past five years are either increasing or holding steady. This progress means that hundreds of thousands of California students will have a better shot at success. But the data also show the persistent achievement gaps in our system that California simply cannot afford to accept – morally, economically, or socially."

Compared with 2003, when all the California Standards Tests (CSTs) were for the first time completely aligned to state standards, the percentage of students scoring advanced or proficient in 2007 increased by 8 points in English-language arts (ELA) or from 35 percent to 43 percent, (Table 1) and 6 points in math, from 35 percent to 41 percent (Table 5).

The percentage of students scoring at the proficient and advanced levels on the fifth grade science test has increased by 13 points since 2004; the first year the test was given (Table 10).

The percentage of students scoring proficient or advanced in grades two, four, seven, and eight have increased in ELA by double digits over the four-year span beginning in 2003 (Table 1).

The greatest improvement over the four-year period for math was made by students in grades three, four, five, and seven with the proficient and advanced percentage increasing by 12, 12, 14, and 10 points, respectively (Table 5).

O'Connell pointed out the lack of progress made in closing the achievement gap among racial groups. While all student subgroup populations have continued to improve since 2003, the gap in achievement between African Americans or blacks and whites and the gap in achievement between Hispanics or Latinos and whites remain relatively unchanged.

"Once again, these annual test scores shine a glaring light on the disparity in achievement between students who are African American or Hispanic and their white or Asian counterparts. We know all children can learn to the same high levels, so we must confront and change those things that are holding back groups of students."

This achievement gap cannot always be explained away because of the poverty that has been so often associated with low performance, he said.

"The results show this explanation not to be universally true," he said. "In fact, African American and Hispanic students who are not poor are achieving at lower levels in math than their white counterparts who are poor. These are not just economic achievement gaps, they are racial achievement gaps. We cannot afford to excuse them; they simply must be addressed. We must take notice and take action."

In response to this pressing issue, O'Connell early this year charged the statewide P-16 council – including leaders from all segments of education as well as business, labor, and community leaders – with examining factors contributing to achievement gaps and strategies for closing those gaps. He is calling on all those interested in this issue to attend the Closing the Achievement Gap - Initiatives, Projects, & Programs scheduled for November 13-14, 2007, in Sacramento.

"The intent of this working Summit is to create an inclusive, interactive, and collaborative environment where educators will gather to share best practices and learn strategies immediately useable to address their daily challenges," he said.

"I'm committed to addressing this issue, to creating the partnerships, sharing the information and employing the strategies that will ensure success for all California students," O'Connell said. "I am excited about this challenge because I know it is one we can overcome. I believe in the ability, in the talent, and in the dedication present in our public schools."

Under the STAR program, California students attain one of five levels of performance on the CSTs for each subject tested: advanced, proficient, basic, below basic, and far below basic. The State Board of Education has established the proficient level as the desired achievement goal for all students. This goal is consistent with school growth targets for state accountability and the federal No Child Left Behind requirements. The state target is for all students to score at the proficient or advanced level. Approximately 4.8 million students participated in 2007 in the STAR program, which is comprised of five components:

  • California Standards Tests (CSTs) are standards-based tests that measure the achievement of state content standards in English-language arts, mathematics, science, and history-social science.
  • California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA) is for students who have significant cognitive disabilities.
  • California Achievement Tests (CAT/6) are nationally norm-referenced tests, taken in grades three and seven only.
  • Aprenda: La prueba de logros en español, Tercera edición (Aprenda 3) is a nationally norm-referenced achievement test of general academic knowledge in Spanish for Spanish-speaking English learners (for grades five through eleven in 2007).
  • Standards-based Tests in Spanish (STS), are designed for Spanish-speaking English learners to measure the achievement of state content standards in reading-language arts and mathematics in Spanish, for grades two, three, and four in 2007.

The STAR Program data released today is preliminary because a small number of school districts have not yet completed testing and have not yet had time to complete a review of the results to verify their accuracy. A second posting of preliminary results that will include all students tested is scheduled for September. Final results after local corrections are incorporated are scheduled for posting during December.

School, school district, county, and state level results for the 2007 STAR Program have been posted on the California Department of Education's Web site at http://star.cde.ca.gov/.

# # # #

Attachments

Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Program
California Standards Test Results, 2003-2007

English–Language Arts
Table 1: Percentages of Students Scoring at Proficient and Above*

Grade

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

Change in Percentage
2006–2007

Change in Percentage
2003–2007

2

36

35

42

47

48

1

12

3

33

30

31

36

37

1

4

4

39

39

47

49

51

2

12

5

36

40

43

43

44

1

8

6

36

36

38

41

42

1

6

7

36

36

43

43

46

3

10

8

31

33

39

41

41

0

10

9

38

37

43

43

47

4

9

10

33

35

36

37

37

0

4

11

32

32

36

36

37

1

5

State Total 2 - 11

35

35

40

42

43

1

8

*Data for 2003 through 2006 are final statewide results. The 2007 data are preliminary and include results for approximately 99% of the students in grades two through eleven. Complete results will be available during September 2007. Percentages included in this table may differ from the percentages printed on the Internet reports due to rounding.

Back to top

California Standards Test and California Alternate
Performance Assessment Results, 2003-2007

English–Language Arts
Table 2: Percentages of Students Scoring at
Proficient and Above by Subgroup*

Subgroup

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

Change in percentage 2003-2007

All Students

35

36

40

42

44

9

Gender

Female

39

40

44

46

48

9

Male

31

32

36

38

40

9

Ethnicity

African American or Black

22

23

27

29

31

9

American Indian or Alaskan Native

31

31

36

37

39

8

Asian

55

57

61

64

66

11

Filipino

48

50

55

58

60

12

Hispanic or Latino

20

21

25

27

29

9

Pacific Islander

31

31

36

39

41

10

White

53

54

58

60

62

9

Economic Status

Economically Disadvantaged

20

21

25

27

29

9

Not Economically Disadvantaged

49

50

57

58

60

11

Disability Status

Students Received Special Education
Services

9

14

16

17

18

9

English Proficiency

English Only Students

44

44

49

51

52

8

Initially-Fluent English Proficient (I-FEP)

46

48

53

56

58

12

Reclassified-Fluent English Proficient
(R-FEP)

40

42

48

50

51

11

English Learners

10

10

12

14

15

5

*Data for 2003 through 2006 are final statewide results. The 2007 data are preliminary and include results for approximately 99% of the students in grades two through eleven. Complete results will be available during September 2007. This table includes results from the California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA), and the percentages included in this table may differ from the percentages printed on the Internet reports.

Back to top

English–Language Arts
Table 3: Percentages of Economically Disadvantaged
Students Scoring at Proficient and Above*

Ethnicity

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

Change in percentage 2003-2007

African American or Black

16

17

21

23

24

8

American Indian or Alaskan Native

20

21

26

27

29

9

Asian

35

37

42

46

48

13

Filipino

37

39

45

48

49

12

Hispanic or Latino

16

17

21

24

26

10

Pacific Islander

21

21

26

29

30

9

White

32

32

37

39

41

9

Table 4: Percentages of Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Scoring at Proficient and Above*

Ethnicity

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

Change in percentage 2003-2007

African American or Black

31

32

36

38

40

9

American Indian or Alaskan Native

41

41

46

48

49

8

Asian

69

70

74

76

77

8

Filipino

53

55

60

62

64

11

Hispanic or Latino

32

33

38

40

42

10

Pacific Islander

40

40

45

48

50

10

White

58

59

64

66

67

9

*Data for 2003 through 2006 are final statewide results. The 2007 data are preliminary and include results for approximately 99% of the students in grades two through eleven. Complete results will be available during September 2007. These tables include results from the California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA), and the percentages included in these tables may differ from the percentages printed on the Internet reports.

Back to top

California Standards Test Results, 2003-2007

Mathematics
Table 5: Percentages of Students Scoring at Proficient and Above*

Grade

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

Change in Percentage
2006–2007

Change in Percentage
2003–2007

Grade 2

53

51

56

58

59

1

6

Grade 3

46

48

54

57

58

1

12

Grade 4

45

45

50

54

57

3

12

Grade 5

35

38

44

48

49

1

14

Grade 6

34

35

40

42

42

0

8

Grade 7

30

33

37

41

40

-1

10

General Mathematics

20

20

22

22

21

-1

1

Algebra I†

21

18

19

23

23

0

2

First time test takers

26

Repeat test takers

15

Geometry

26

24

26

26

24

-2

-2

Algebra II

29

24

26

25

27

2

-2

Summative High School Math

43

41

45

46

48

2

5

Integrated 1

7

7

7

9

9

0

2

State Total Grades 2 - 7 and End-of-Course tests

35

34

38

41

41

0

6

*Data for 2003 through 2006 are final statewide results. The 2007 data are preliminary and include results for approximately 99% of the students in the states. Complete results will be available during September 2007. Percentages included in this table may differ from the percentages printed on the Internet reports due to rounding.

†Prior to 2007, algebra I was an end-of-course test for grades eight through eleven students. In 2007, students in grades seven were allowed to take the algebra I test.

Note: The results for integrated 2 and 3 are not reported due to the small numbers of test-takers.

Back to top

Mathematics
Table 6: Numbers of Students Tested*

Test

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

Change in Number
2006-2007

Change in Number
2003-2007

General Mathematics

451,126

417,946

374,900

340,335

305,413

-34,922

-145,713

Algebra I

505,883

614,347

681,924

707,285

741,152

33,867

235,269

Geometry

270,560

301,112

333,334

359,926

370,120

10,194

99,560

Algebra II

162,672

181,883

196,079

213,770

230,881

17,111

68,209

Sum. High School Math

76,560

80,574

90,983

99,348

108,769

9,421

32,209

Integrated 1

14,359

9,679

8,716

6,771

7,010

239

-7,349

Integrated 2

9,733

7,905

6,698

4,273

3,626

-647

-6,107

Integrated 3

10,043

4,424

3,558

2,223

1,657

-566

-8,386

Total

1,500,936

1,617,870

1,696,192

1,733,931

1,768,628

34,697

267,692

*Data for 2003 through 2006 are final statewide results. The 2007 data are preliminary and include results for approximately 99% of the students in the state. Complete results will be available during September 2007. Percentages included in this table may differ from the percentages printed on the Internet reports due to rounding.

Back to top

California Standards Test and California Alternate
Performance Assessment Results, 2003-2007

Mathematics
Table 7: Percentages of Students Scoring at
Proficient and Above by Subgroup*

Subgroup

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

Change in percentage 2003-2007

All Students

35

34

38

41

41

6

Gender

Female

34

34

38

40

40

6

Male

35

35

39

41

41

6

Ethnicity

African American or Black

19

19

23

25

25

6

American Indian or Alaskan Native

29

28

32

34

34

5

Asian

60

60

64

67

67

7

Filipino

44

45

50

53

53

9

Hispanic or Latino

23

23

27

30

30

7

Pacific Islander

31

31

35

38

38

7

White

47

46

51

53

53

6

Economic Status

Economically Disadvantaged

24

25

29

31

31

7

Not Economically Disadvantaged

45

44

49

52

52

7

Disability Status

Students Received Special Education Services

13

16

18

20

20

7

English Proficiency

English Only Students

39

39

43

45

45

6

Initially-Fluent English Proficient (I-FEP)

45

45

49

52

53

8

Reclassified-Fluent English Proficient
(R-FEP)

37

37

41

43

42

5

English Learners

20

20

24

26

26

6

*Data for 2003 through 2006 are final statewide results. The 2007 data are preliminary and include results for approximately 99% of the students in the state. Complete results will be available during September 2007. This table includes results from the California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA), and the percentages included in this table may differ from the percentages printed on the Internet reports.

Back to top

Mathematics
Table 8: Percentages of Economically Disadvantaged
Students Scoring at Proficient and Above*

Ethnicity

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

Change in percentage 2003-2007

African American or Black

16

16

20

22

22

6

American Indian or Alaskan Native

23

23

27

29

28

5

Asian

45

46

51

53

54

9

Filipino

40

41

46

49

48

8

Hispanic or Latino

21

22

26

28

29

8

Pacific Islander

25

25

30

32

33

8

White

33

32

37

38

38

5

Table 9: Percentages of Not Economically Disadvantaged
Students Scoring at Proficient and Above*

Ethnicity

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

Change in percentage 2003-2007

African American or Black

24

24

27

30

30

6

American Indian or Alaskan Native

35

34

38

40

40

5

Asian

71

70

73

76

76

5

Filipino

46

46

52

55

55

9

Hispanic or Latino

29

29

33

36

36

7

Pacific Islander

37

36

40

43

44

7

White

51

50

54

57

56

5

*Data for 2003 through 2006 are final statewide results. The 2007 data are preliminary and include results for approximately 99% of the students in the state. Complete results will be available during September 2007. These tables include results from the California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA), and the percentages included in these tables may differ from the percentages printed on the Internet reports.

Back to top

California Standards Test Results, 2004-2007

Science—Grade Level Tests*
Table 10: Percentages of Students Scoring at Proficient and Above†

Grade

2004

2005

2006

2007

Change in Percentage
2006-2007

Change in Percentage
2004-2007

5

24

28

32

37

5

13

8

NA

NA

38

43

5

NA

10

NA

NA

34

35

1

NA

State Total 5, 8, & 10

NA

NA

35

38

3

NA

*The Grade Five California Science Standards Test was first administered in spring 2004. The Grade Eight California Science Standards and the Grade Ten California Life Science Standards Tests were first administered during spring 2006.

†Data for 2004 through 2006 are final statewide data. The 2007 data are preliminary and include results for approximately 99% of the students in the state. Complete results will be available during September 2007. Percentages included in this table may differ from the percentages printed on the Internet reports due to rounding.

Back to top

Science—End-of-Course Tests (Grades Nine Through Eleven)
Table 11: Percentages of Students Scoring at Proficient and Above*

Test

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

Change in Percentage
2006-2007

Change in Percentage
2003-2007

Earth Science

21

22

23

23

26

3

5

Biology

37

30

32

35

37

2

0

Chemistry

31

28

27

27

31

4

0

Physics

29

29

31

32

36

4

7

Integrated 1

7

5

8

9

11

2

4

Integrated 2

8

8

6

5

7

2

-1

State Total for End-of-Course Tests

29

24

27

28

31

3

2

*Data for 2003 through 2006 are final statewide results. The 2007 data are preliminary and include results for approximately 99% of the students in the state. Complete results will be available during September 2007. Percentages included in this table may differ from the percentages printed on the Internet reports due to rounding.

Note: The results for integrated 3 and 4 are not reported due to the small numbers of test-takers

Back to top

Science—End-of-Course (Grades Nine Through Eleven)
Table 12: Numbers of Students Tested*

Test

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

Change in Number
2006-2007

Change in Number
2003-2007

Earth Science

89,676

134,953

173,958

195,394

206,192

10,798

116,516

Biology

334,005

397,909

453,685

498,204

505,316

7,112

171,311

Chemistry

153,491

181,420

196,700

213,387

227,435

14,048

73,944

Physics

44,878

52,586

59,382

61,088

63,357

2,269

18,479

Integrated 1

62,008

101,824

111,366

107,068

96,235

-10,833

34,227

Integrated 2

25,983

24,654

20,629

17,407

13,787

-3,620

-12,196

Integrated 3

10,621

5,870

3,414

2,540

1,973

-567

-8,648

Integrated 4

1,515

1,601

1,040

817

951

134

-564

Total

722,177

900,817

1,020,174

1,095,905

1,115,246

19,341

393,069

*Data for 2003 through 2006 are final statewide results. The 2007 data are preliminary and include results for approximately 99% of the students in the state. Complete results will be available during September 2007. Percentages included in this table may differ from the percentages printed on the Internet reports due to rounding.

Back to top

History–Social Science
Table 13: Percentages of Students Scoring at Proficient and Above†

Grade

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

Change in Percentage
2006-2007

Change in Percentage
2003-2007

8

27

27

31

34

35

1

8

11 (U.S. History)

34

32

37

35

35

0

1

World History (End-of-Course)*

27

27

31

30

29

-1

2

State Total 8, 11 Plus End-of-Course Test

29

28

33

33

33

0

4

†Data for 2003 through 2006 are final statewide results. The 2007 data are preliminary and include results for approximately 99% of the students in the state. Complete results will be available during September 2007. Percentages included in this table may differ from the percentages printed on the Internet reports due to rounding.

*Prior to 2007, the world history test was an end-of-course test for grade ten students only. In 2007, students in grades nine through eleven took the end-of-course world history.

Back to top

Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Program
Summary of 2007 Results

Background
  • The 2007 STAR Program consists of five components, including the California Standards Tests (CSTs) and the California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA).
  • In spring 2007, the following CSTs were required for all students:
  • English–language artsGrades 2 – 11
  • MathematicsGrades 2 – 9
  • Science Grades 5, 8, and 10 (life science)
  • History–social science Grades 8 and 11 (U.S. history)
  • Students were also able to take end-of-course tests in math and science in grades 9 through 11 if they were enrolled in the corresponding courses.
  • Students who were unable to take the CSTs with accommodations or modifications took the CAPA in ELA and mathematics.
Reporting STAR Program Results
  • The CST and CAPA results are reported using five performance levels: advanced, proficient, basic, below basic, and far below basic. The state target is to have all students score at the proficient level or above. The percentages of students scoring at each performance level are reported by grade and subject for all students and for subgroups of students.

Summary of CST Results

A summary of statewide student performance on the CSTs is provided below by content area. (CAPA results are included in the English–language arts and mathematics subgroup tables 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, and 9.) Note that while final data are available for the years 2003 through 2006, the results reported for 2007 are preliminary and include only the results for students tested through June 30, 2007.

English–Language Arts (ELA)
  • The percentage of students in grades two through eleven scoring at proficient and advanced levels increased approximately 8 percent between 2003 and 2007. The one-year increase, however, was a modest 1 percent (see Table 1).
  • Notably, since 2003, the percentage of students scoring proficient and advanced in ELA in grades two and four, has increased by 12 percent; in grades seven and eight by 10 percent (see Table 1). While all student subgroups have continued to improve since 2003, the gap in achievement between African Americans or blacks and whites and the gap in achievement between Hispanics or Latinos and whites remain unchanged (see Table 2).
  • Since 2003, the student subgroups showing the greatest improvement in achieving proficient and advanced were Asians (11percent), Filipinos (12percent), and Pacific Islanders (10 percent) (see Table2). The student subgroups whose performance showed the least improvement in achieving proficient and advanced were African Americans or blacks (9 percent), American Indians or Alaskan Natives (8 percent), Hispanics or Latinos (9percent), and whites (9 percent).
  • The results listed in Tables 3 and 4 show that the performance of African Americans or blacks and Hispanics or Latinos continues to lag behind whites regardless of economic status. In fact, for 2007, the percentage of not economically disadvantaged African Americans or blacks (40 percent) and the percentage of not economically disadvantaged Hispanics or Latinos (42 percent) achieving proficient and advanced are nearly the same as the percentage of economically disadvantaged whites (41 percent) achieving proficient and advanced.
Mathematics
  • Overall, students in all grades and courses scoring at proficient and advanced levels in mathematics showed an increase of approximately 6 percent between 2003 and 2007 (see Table 5). However, the overall percentage of students scoring at proficient and advanced remains unchanged from last year.
  • The greatest improvements over the four-year period in achieving proficient and advanced were made by students in grades three (12 percent), four (12percent), five (14 percent), and seven (10 percent).
  • Modest declines were observed in grade 7 (-1), General Mathematics (-1), and Geometry (-2) from last year.
  • Nearly three-quarters of a million students took the algebra I test (see Table 6). Of the 741,152 students who took the algebra I test, 26 percent of the first-time test-takers scored proficient and advanced and 15 percent of the repeat test-takers scored proficient and advanced (see Table 5).
  • While all student subgroups have continued to improve since 2003, the gap in achievement between African Americans or blacks and whites and the gap in achievement between Hispanics or Latinos and whites remain unchanged (see Table 7).
  • The results listed in tables 8 and 9 show that the performance of African Americans or blacks and Hispanics or Latinos continues to lag behind whites regardless of economic status. In fact, for 2007, the percentage of not economically disadvantaged African Americans or blacks (30 percent) and the percentage of not economically disadvantaged Hispanics or Latinos (36 percent) achieving proficient and advanced is below the percentage of economically disadvantaged whites (38percent) achieving proficient and advanced.
Science
  • The percentage of students scoring at the proficient and advanced levels on the grade five science test has increased by 13 percent since 2004, and the percentages of students scoring at the proficient and advanced levels on the grades eight and ten science tests increased by 5 percent and 1 percent respectively since the tests were first administered in 2006 (see Table 10).
  • Overall, an increase of 2 percentage points was observed in the four-year period for the science end-of-course tests. Gains were noted in physics (7percent), earth sciences (5 percent), and integrated 1 (4 percent). No gains were seen for students taking the biology and chemistry tests, and a 1 percent loss was seen for students taking integrated 2 (see Table 11).
  • An overall 3-point increase in the percentage of students scoring at the proficient and advanced levels in the end-of-course tests was noted from last year.
  • Approximately 1.1 million students in grades nine through eleven took end-of-course tests in science in 2007. Since 2003, the number of students taking biology, chemistry, earth science, physics, and integrated 1 increased by 414,477 (see Table 12).
History–Social Science
  • The results for students on the history–social science tests were mixed. Since 2003, students taking the grade eight history–social science test scoring at proficient and advanced levels showed an increase of 8 percent, while students taking the grade eleven (U.S. history) test and the end-of-course world history test showed modest gains with increases of 1 and 2 percent respectively (see Table13).
  • Overall, the percentage of students scoring proficient and advanced remains unchanged from last year. Please note: prior to 2007 the world history test was a grade-level test for students in grade ten only. In 2007, students in grades nine, ten,and eleven took this test if they were completing a world history course.

Back to top

 

# # # #


Jack O'Connell — State Superintendent of Public Instruction
Communications Division, Room 5206, 916-319-0818, Fax 916-319-0100

Download Free Readers