Skip to content
Printer-friendly version

ESEA State Role

Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA)
Reauthorization Recommendations: State Role
Policy Recommendations
Rationale for Improvements

Even with Federal support and incentives to drive reform and student achievement, States remain the focal point of education in our country. State policies and procedures drive change at the local and school building level. States, in addition to their role of ensuring compliance and accountability for Federal funds, must play a greater role in improving and reforming districts and schools.

California Overview

California has more residents and public schools than any other state. As a state education agency, California serves over 1,000 school districts, 9,900 schools (including over 6,000 Title I schools), 300,000 teachers, and 6 million students.

Nearly half of California’s student population is Hispanic/Latino and has larger percentages of Asian and American Indian students than the other three largest states (Texas, New York, and Florida). While around 9% of students nationwide are English language learners (ELLs), a full 25% of California's students are ELLs, representing more than 50 different languages. Students receiving special education services consistently make up almost 11% of the school population in California.

In recent years, the California Department of Education has largely focused on ensuring that schools and districts comply with Federal regulations, but recent changes in educational leadership in the state provide an opportunity for a transformation in our educational culture. California serves a large portion of our nation’s students, inevitably making a significant impact on the future of our country. Moving forward, our vision of the state’s future role is to provide the essential support and mechanisms to ensure every district and school has the ability to meet the needs of its students and families.

We therefore want to improve and customize technical assistance and professional development for administrative leaders throughout the state, rather than simply driving compliance with Federal requirements. Additionally, the dissemination of best practices will be critical in implementing programs that are already proven to work and increase student achievement and family engagement. While compliance with Federal requirements is important and necessary, the state must also ensure it is providing the necessary supports to districts and schools so they can improve and educate their students.

The state cannot implement this vision without the support of the federal government. The shift to competitive programs away from formula programs will eliminate many of the required resources to develop capacity and fund innovation within the state. Rather than competitive programs, states need increased flexibility to leverage resources from various existing funding streams.

Questions:   John Hooper | | 916-319-0821
Download Free Readers