California Department of Education (http://www.cde.ca.gov/sp/sw/t1/sig09.asp)
Page Generated: 12/3/2012 1:46:07 AM
Display version

School Improvement Grant


The School Improvement Grant (SIG) provides funding to help local educational agencies (LEAs) address the needs of schools in improvement, corrective action, and restructuring to improve student achievement. SIG funds are to be used to leverage change and improve technical assistance through LEAs targeting activities towards measurable outcomes. Expected results from the use of these funds include improving student proficiency, increasing the numbers of schools that make adequate yearly progress, using data to inform decisions, and creating a system of continuous feedback and improvement.

Program Description

Persistently Lowest-Achieving Schools

School Improvement Grant Monitoring and Reporting Tool (SIGMART)
Use the SIGMART to view and modify budgets and report quarterly expenditures.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) (Updated 24-Jan-2011)

Regional Information (Coming Soon)

Select a region number from the table below to see detailed SIG information by region. Information provided includes a district contact, funding amounts, model selection, and SIG documents such as original applications and currently approved budget documents.

Map of California showing 11 regions of various counties. The names of the counties for each region are on the following table.

Region Counties
1 Del Norte Humboldt, Lake, Mendocino, Sonoma
2 Butte, Glenn, Lassen, Modoc, Plumas, Shasta, Siskiyou, Tehama, Trinity
3 Alpine, Colusa, El Dorado, Nevada, Placer, Sacramento, Sierra, Sutter, Yolo, Yuba
4 Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, San Francisco, San Mateo, Solano
5 Monterey, San Benito, Santa Clara, Santa Cruz
6 Amador, Calaveras, San Joaquin, Stanislaus, Tuolumne
7 Fresno, Kings, Madera, Mariposa, Merced, Tulare
8 San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Ventura, Kern
9 Imperial, Orange, San Diego
10 San Bernardino, Inyo, Riverside, Mono
11 Los Angeles
SIG Cohort 2

This RFA was closed as of November 18, 2011.The Cohort 2 RFA was re-released on September 30, 2011. The list of funded applications is available and award notifications were mailed on February 1, 2012.

2010 School Improvement Grant Webinar (PPT)

Alternative Text Version of 2010 School Improvement Grant Webinar
(DOC)

Cohort 2 Letter of Program Improvement Start-Over (New 09-Nov-2012)

SIG Cohort 1

This RFA was closed as of July 2, 2010. The Cohort 1 RFA (Revised 17-Jun-2010) was initially posted June 24, 2010 and was due July 2, 2010. An initial list of SIG applications (XLS) received was posted on July 8, 2010. The list of funded applications is available and award notifications were mailed on September 30, 2010.

School Improvement Grant Update Letter (DOC; Dated 30-Sep-2010)

2009 School Improvement Grant Webinar (WMV; 01:31:08; Dated 15-Apr-2010)

Alternative Text Version of 2009 School Improvement Grant Webinar
(DOC)

Cohort 1 Letter of Program Improvement Start-Over


SIG Reporting and Monitoring

SIGMART Logon

SIGMART Instructions

Quarterly expenditure reports are due at the conclusion of each quarter.

Quarter
Report Period*
Report Due Date
Notes
Pre-Imp
1 Mar - 30 Sep
30-Sep Reporting is required for those sub-grantees that participated in approved pre-implementation activities.
First
1 Jul - 30 Sep
31-Oct
Report non-cumulative expenditures.
Second
1 Oct - 31 Dec
31-Jan
Report non-cumulative expenditures.
Third
1 Jan - 31 Mar
30-Apr
Report non-cumulative expenditures.
Fourth
1 Apr - 30 Jun
30-Aug
**Submit via the School Improvement Grant Monitoring and Reporting Tool (SIGMART) available in mid-August 2012. This is a one-time change to the due date as this report is normally due on 31-Jul.
Fifth
1 Jul - 30 Sep
31-Oct Report non-cumulative expenditures.

*Thus far cumulative expenditures were reported. Beginning with the 2011-12 fourth quarter expenditure report non-cumulative expenditures should be reported.

** Beginning with the 2011-12 fourth quarter expenditure report use the SIGMART application to report expenditures. Do not use the California Accountability and Improvement System (CAIS).

On-site Reviews

SIG On-site Reviews
Provides general information about the required reviews including review schedules, training, and the program instrument.

Budget and Program Revision Requests (updated 12-Sept-12)

Budget and Program Revision Requests (Updated 7-Nov-12)

Contact the assigned consultant to discuss the nature of the request and give the consultant notice that you plan to submit a revision request. This allows time to discuss the proposed changes and provides an opportunity for the consultant to provide feedback.

Please use the following criteria from the SIG Non-Regulatory Guidance External link opens in new window or tab. when trying to decide if an activity/expenditure is allowable:

Budget Revision Requests

LEAs must submit a budget revision request and receive approval from the CDE prior to increasing or decreasing object code series totals or moving funds from an approved object code series to other object code series. The previous policy allowed LEAs to shift funds locally and without approval for amounts equal to or less than ten percent of the object code series total. However, the SIGMART must contain accurate figures so local, unapproved changes are currently not permitted. Future updates to SIGMART will include allowing an LEA to move funds between object code series without approval if the amount is ten percent or less of the object code series total.   

LEAs retain the flexibility to move funds but requests will only be approved if the new use for the money is directly related to implementation of one of the model components of the selected school intervention model and the revision does not compromise the LEA's ability to implement any required element of the selected model(s). Revision requests will only be considered if the change targets the same need(s), or the LEA can demonstrate that the need(s) targeted by the funds is already being met.

Submitting a budget revision is a two part process.

Programmatic Revision Requests

Prepare a document explaining the details of the revision request and revise the appropriate SIG Implementation Chart to reflect which activities will be added or removed. Submit the details of the revision request and the revised SIG Implementation Chart to the assigned consultant.  If the programmatic revision also results in a budget revision, please follow the budget revision process shown above.

Submitting the revised Budget Narrative Form
Cohort
Send To
E-mail
LEA/School
Form Number
1
Ray Gordon, Jr.
5a/5b
2
Thomas Williamson
4b/5b

Contact Us
A list of consultants and assigned LEAs.

Questions:   School Turnaround Office | STO@cde.ca.gov | 916-319-0833
Last Reviewed: Friday, November 16, 2012