Skip to main content
California Department of Education Logo

Flag Definitions for 1999-00 Growth API Data File

Flag values and definitions for the 1999-2000 Growth Academic Performance Index (API) Data File.

Flag Value Flag Definition
<blank or null>
Report Available
0

This school (or the district on behalf of the school) reported to the California Department of Education that an irregularity in testing procedure occurred during the Spring 2000 Stanford 9 testing. The Department is currently reviewing the matter.

1

This school has reported that it is correcting 2000 STAR demographic information. The 1999–2000 API Growth Report, reflecting corrections to this information, will be available in December 2000.
Eligibility for awards will also be determined in December 2000.

2

The district superintendent has certified that this school experienced a significant demographic change between the Spring 1999 and Spring 2000 Stanford 9 testing periods and that the test results across years are not comparable. Therefore, a 2000 API (Growth) will not be calculated for this school.

The 2000 API (Base) will be released in January 2001.

3

This school had no Stanford 9 test results in 2000.

4

This school serves a non-traditional student population and has elected to participate in the alternative accountability system. It is projected that the first reporting for schools in the alternative accountability system will be in December 2001.

5

In 2000, this school had fewer than 100 valid Stanford 9 test scores. If the school had at least 11 students with 2000 Stanford 9 test results contributing to the API, it will receive a small school 2000 API (Base) for the 2000–2001 API reporting cycle. The small school API is designated with an asterisk (*), designed to acknowledge the greater statistical uncertainty of an API based on fewer than 100 scores.

The 2000 API (Base) will be released in January 2001.

6

The district superintendent (or principal, if an independent charter school) has certified that the scores obtained on the 2000 administration of the Stanford 9 do not reflect the performance of the students at the school.

7

For at least one Stanford 9 content area, this school failed to test a significant proportion of students who were not exempt from testing.

8

As of the time of the release of this report, this school has unresolved discrepancies in its demographic data for the 2000 Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR).

9

This school's data are being withheld pending review of the Spring 2000 Stanford 9 results by the district.

10

This school (or the district on behalf of the school) reported that it would correct 2000 STAR demographic information through the testing contractor. However, the information has not been corrected, and the validity of the school's API is in question.

11

This school (or the district on behalf of the school) reported that it would correct 2000 STAR demographic information through the testing contractor. The district has forwarded the corrections to the testing contractor in a timely manner. However, the information has not been corrected, and the validity of the school's API is in question. The California Department of Education is currently reviewing the matter.

12

This school (or the district on behalf of the school) has certified to the California Department of Education that an irregularity in testing procedure occurred during the Spring 2000 Stanford 9 testing. Therefore, a 2000 API (Growth) and 2000 API (Base) will not be reported for this school.

13

The school level results from the Spring 2000 Stanford 9 may not be representative of the total student population at the school. The California Department of Education is currently reviewing the matter.

14

The school's proportion of students excused at parent request compared to its Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) program enrollment on the first day of testing is equal to or greater than 15 percent. Therefore, a 2000 API will not be reported for this school.

The State Board of Education adopted regulations to this effect on January 11, 2001 (Section 1032 (d)(4) of Article 1.7 to Subchapter 4, Chapter 2, Division 1 of Title 5 of the California Code of Regulations). These regulations apply to both the 2000 API (Growth) and the 2000 API (Base).

Questions: Academic Accountability Team | aau@cde.ca.gov | 916-319-0863 
Last Reviewed: Tuesday, November 10, 2015

Share this Page

Recently Posted in Accountability

  • RELEASE: 2014–15 TITLE III ACCOUNTABILITY REPORTS (added 05-Feb-2016)
    Letter announcing the 2014-15 Title III Accountability Reports are now available
  • CALPADS AYP LEA and School Detail Report (added 05-Feb-2016)
    Detail overview of the California Longitudinal Pupil Achievement Data System (CALPADS) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Detail Report available for local educational agencies (LEAs) and schools.
  • AYP Reports in the CALPADS for Data Corrections (DOC) (added 05-Feb-2016)
    Overview of the two Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Reports in the California Longitudinal Pupil Achievement Data System (CALPADS) and how to leverage these reports to correct demographic, program participation, and enrollment
  • CALPADS AYP LEA and School Detail Report ? AYP (DOC) (added 05-Feb-2016)
    Detail overview of the California Longitudinal Pupil Achievement Data System (CALPADS) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Detail Report available for local educational agencies (LEAs) and schools.
  • CALPADS AYP LEAs and Schools Summary Report (DOC) (added 05-Feb-2016)
    Detailed overview of the California Longitudinal Pupil Achievement Data System (CALPADS) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Summary Report available for local educational agencies (LEAs) and schools.

  • CALPADS AYP LEAs and Schools Summary Report (added 05-Feb-2016)
    Detailed overview of the California Longitudinal Pupil Achievement Data System (CALPADS) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Summary Report available for local educational agencies (LEAs) and schools.
  • Record Layout for 2014-15 Title III Research File (added 03-Feb-2016)
    Record Layout for 2014-15 Title III Research File
  • SARC Coordinator FAQs (added 29-Jan-2016)
    Frequently asked questions (FAQs) regarding the School Accountability Report Card (SARC) by SARC Coordinators.
  • 2014-15 SARC Data Layout (DOC) (added 16-Dec-2015)
    School Accountability Report Card (SARC) Data Layout used to map field names to descriptive labels for each table.
  • 2015 Appeal Form (DOC) (added 15-Dec-2015)
    School and Local Educational Agency Appeal Form for the 2015 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results.