Skip to main content
California Department of Education Logo

Glossary for the 2004–05 API Growth Report

Glossary of terms to assist in interpreting the 2004–05 Academic Performance Index (API) Growth Report.
Organization of the Glossary

The glossary is divided into three sections that correspond to each sub-report of the 2004–05 Academic Performance Index (API) Growth Report. Terms in each section are listed in the order in which they appear on the sub-report for a school or local educational agency (LEA). An LEA is a school district or county office of education.

Detailed information about the calculation of the API is located in the 2004–05 Academic Performance Index Growth Report Information Guide.

Background Information

The API is the centerpiece of the state academic accountability system in California public education. The Public Schools Accountability Act (PSAA) of 1999 (Chapter 3, Statutes of 1999) requires that the California Department of Education (CDE) annually calculate APIs for California public schools, including charter schools, and publish school rankings based on these APIs. The PSAA requires the establishment of a minimum 5 percent annual API growth target for each school as well as an overall statewide API performance target for all schools.

The API is also used in federal academic accountability requirements as an additional indicator for measuring Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) under Title I of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001. As a result, LEAs also receive API reports. To demonstrate progress on the API in 2005 for NCLB purposes, an LEA or school must have a 2005 API Growth score of at least 590 or make at least one point of growth from the 2004 API Base score.

Each annual API reporting cycle includes two reports: a base report, which appears after the first of the calendar year, and a growth report, which appears after school starts in the fall. This pair of reports is based on APIs calculated in exactly the same fashion with the same indicators but using test results from two different years. The 2004 API Base Report and 2004–05 API Growth Report comprise the sixth API reporting cycle.

Questions: Academic Accountability Team | | 916-319-0863 
Last Reviewed: Monday, May 4, 2015

Share this Page

Recently Posted in Accountability

  • AYP Prior Year Alternative Methods (added 01-Oct-2015)
    AYP Alternative Methods used to calculate and report the Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Report.
  • SES: Application Instructions (added 17-Sep-2015)
    Instructions for appicants on submission of online application for 2016-18 RFA.
  • Form I: Training (DOC) (added 17-Sep-2015)
    Form to describe the ongoing professional development opportunities that will be provided to SES staff.
  • Form H: Cash Projections (DOC) (added 17-Sep-2015)
    Form for input of projected source of revenue and expenses.
  • Form G: SES Staff (DOC) (added 17-Sep-2015)
    Form for input of qualifications of program staff for submitted SES application.

  • SES Application (DOC) (added 17-Sep-2015)
    Instructions for applicants submitting for consideration to be approved as Supplemental Educational Services Provider, 2016-18.
  • SES Application Workshops (added 17-Sep-2015)
    Workshops to provide an overview and submission of the SES application for 2016-18.
  • Form F: Status Verification (DOC) (added 17-Sep-2015)
    Form is required if terminated from another state?s list of approved providers at any time within the preceding two fiscal years.
  • Form E: Test Instrument (DOC) (added 17-Sep-2015)
    Form for input of information to show the adequacy of the testing instruments used.
  • Form D: Data Record (DOC) (added 17-Sep-2015)
    Form for input of data to show record of effectiveness for students served, Year 1.