Skip to content
Printer-friendly version

2007 AYP Alternative Methods

Description of alternative methods used to calculate and report the 2007 Adequate Yearly Progress Report (AYP).
Schools or Local Educational Agencies (LEAs) with Limited Results

The No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 requires that all schools be included in Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) reporting. Not all schools contain grades for which AYP data are collected. A number of alternative methodologies to combine and report data, therefore, were required for the 2007 AYP Report.

Only schools and local educational agencies (LEAs) with 2007 California Standards Test (CST) or California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA) results in grades two through eight, or California High School Exit Examination (CAHSEE) or CAPA results in grade ten were processed for participation rates, percent proficient, and Academic Performance Index (API) according to the standard procedures. Other schools and LEAs were evaluated using alternative methodologies.

Only schools and LEAs with 2007 graduation rates (Class of 2005–2006) had the graduation rates calculated using standard procedures. High schools without 2007 graduation rates or high schools with the primary mission of returning students to the regular classroom in a comprehensive high school were evaluated using alternative methodologies.

Standard calculations were used for most schools, LEAs, and subgroups in the 2007 AYP Reports, indicated by a blank in the “Alternative Method” column(s) on the reports. Alternative methodologies are listed below.

Alternative Methods

AJ = Adjustment for students with disabilities: If a school or LEA does not make AYP in mathematics in 2007 solely due to its students with disabilities subgroup not making the Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs), 20 percentage points were added to the school’s or LEA’s percent proficient in mathematics for this subgroup. This alternative method was also applied to grade span calculations on the LEA 2006 Program Improvement (PI) Report when applicable.

CA = County average: For LEAs with no results on tests used in AYP calculations or no graduation rate (if applicable), calculations were based on the county-wide averages.

CI = Passed using confidence intervals: Small schools and LEAs with fewer than 100 valid scores have adjusted AMOs to account for the small number of test scores. These schools and LEAs met the adjusted percent proficient criteria using a confidence interval methodology. Very small schools and LEAs with fewer than 11 valid scores have adjusted API criteria to account for the very small number of test scores. These schools and LEAs met the adjusted API criteria using confidence interval methodology.

CK = CAPA and CAHSEE only: Schools with CAPA and CAHSEE but no CST results have APIs based only on CAPA and CAHSEE.

CP = CAPA only: Schools with only CAPA results have APIs based only on CAPA.

DA = District average: For schools with no results on tests used in AYP calculations or no graduation rate (if applicable), calculations were based on the school district averages.

EN = Enrollment less than 50: Schools or LEAs with less than 50 students enrolled do not have participation rate criteria, and "Yes" is shown for school-wide or LEA-wide in the "Met 2007 AYP Criteria" column on the report.

ER = Enrollment 50 to 99: Small schools and LEAs with 50 to 99 students enrolled have slightly adjusted participation rate criteria to account for the small numbers. These adjusted criteria also apply to numerically significant subgroups within a school or LEA that has at least 100 students enrolled. Schools, LEAs, or subgroups with 50 students enrolled met participation rate criteria by having at least 47 students tested. Schools, LEAs, or subgroups with between 51 and 99 students enrolled met participation rate criteria by having a participation rate of at least 95 percent, but the rate was rounded up to the nearest whole number.

G1 = Grade 11 only: High schools without grade ten CAHSEE results and no grade nine CST results but with grade eleven CST results based on at least 95 percent tested on CST in mathematics have participation rates and percent proficient based on grade eleven CST results.

G9 = Grade 9 only: High schools without grade ten CAHSEE results but with grade nine CST results have participation rates and percent proficient based on grade nine CST results.

KC = CAHSEE only: Schools with CAHSEE but no CST or CAPA results have APIs based only on CAHSEE.

OT = Other: In very rare cases, special calculations may have been required due to unique situations.

PS = Pair and share: California testing begins in grade two. For schools with only kindergarten and/or grade one, the scores for the schools to which these students matriculate were used. This is also referred to as “pairing and sharing.” For schools that do not supply pair and share data, the school district or county values are used (CA or DA).

PX = Proxy graduation rate: For traditional comprehensive high schools with no graduation rates, a proxy graduation rate was calculated based on the school's available CBEDS dropout and enrollment data for grades 9-11.

SH = Passed by Safe Harbor: The school, LEA, or subgroup met the criteria for Safe Harbor, which is an alternate method of meeting the AMO if a school, LEA, or subgroup shows progress in moving students from scoring at the below proficient level to the proficient level.

UE = Passed by One Point Growth: The school had under eleven valid scores in one or both years but made at least one point growth in API.

Y2 = Passed by using 2-year average: Schools, LEAs, and subgroups that have not met 2007 AYP participation rate or percent proficient (AMO) criteria using a one-year formula met the participation rate or AMO using a two-year formula.

Y3 = Passed by using 3-year average: Schools, LEAs, and subgroups that have not met 2007 AYP participation rate or percent proficient (AMO) criteria using a one- or two-year formula met the participation rate or AMO using a three-year formula.

Note: The original data for the school, LEA, or subgroup are shown on the 2007 AYP Report, even though the alternative method is used as the criterion, unless the school, LEA, or subgroup had no results for enrollment, valid scores, and/or graduation rate. In those cases, the alternative data are shown on the report.

Questions: Academic Accountability Team | aau@cde.ca.gov | 916-319-0863 
Download Free Readers