Field Name |
Type |
Width |
Description |
|---|---|---|---|
cds |
Char |
14 |
County/District/School code |
type |
Char |
1 |
Type 1=Unified, 2=Elementary District, 3=9-12 High District, 4=7-12 High District |
cname |
Char |
15 |
County name |
dname |
Char | 30 |
District name |
pi_status |
Char |
10 |
Indicates whether the Local Educational Agency (LEA) is in Program Improvement (PI) (In PI or Not in PI) |
| pi_imple | Char | 10 |
Indicates the LEA's first year of implementing PI requirements |
pi_prior |
Char |
10 |
Indicates the LEA’s placement under No Child Left Behind (NCLB) for 2010-2011 (Year 1, Year 2, or Year 3) |
pi_place |
Char |
10 |
Indicates the LEA’s placement under NCLB for 2011-2012 (Year 1, Year 2, or Year 3) |
| pi_exit | Char | 10 |
The year the LEA exited PI (the last year the LEA implemented PI activities) |
ela_met_10 |
Char |
5 |
Met LEA-wide Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) English-Language Arts (ELA) criteria in 2010 - includes participation rate and proficiency criteria (Yes, No, YMA=Yes met on Appeal, or N/A) |
mth_met_10 |
Char |
5 |
Met LEA-wide AYP Math criteria in 2010 - includes participation rate and proficiency criteria (Yes, No, YMA=Yes met on Appeal, or N/A) |
api_10 |
Char |
5 |
Met LEA-wide Academic Performance Index (API) criteria in 2010 (Yes, No, YMA=Yes met on Appeal, or N/A) |
grad_10 |
Char |
5 |
Met LEA-wide Graduation in 2010 (Yes, No, YMA=Yes Met on Appeal, or N/A) |
ela_met_11 |
Char |
5 |
Met LEA-wide AYP ELA criteria in 2011 - includes participation rate and proficiency criteria (Yes, No, YMA=Yes met on Appeal, or N/A) |
mth_met_11 |
Char |
5 |
Met LEA-wide AYP Math criteria in 2011 - includes participation rate and proficiency criteria (Yes, No, YMA=Yes met on Appeal, or N/A) |
api_11 |
Char |
5 |
Met LEA-wide API criteria in 2011 (Yes, No, YMA=Yes met on Appeal, or N/A) |
grad_11 |
Char |
5 |
Met LEA-wide Graduation in 2011 (Yes, No, YMA=Yes met on Appeal, or N/A) |
| spc_cond | Char | 2 |
Special Conditions (FF= District that had break in Title I funding but resumed taking Title I funds last year retains previous Program Improvement (PI) status and placement year (flip flop policy), P2= District lacks AYP data to evaluate PI status and placement during initial data release (P1) and is being held in former PI status and placement until AYP data becomes available (P2).) |