Skip to content
Printer-friendly version

2012–13 LEA PI Status Record Layout

Data file record layout of Title I LEAs' Program Improvement (PI) status based on Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP).
Field Name
Type
Width
Description

cds

Char

14

County/District/School code

type

Char

1

Type 1=Unified, 2=Elementary District, 3=9-12 High District, 4=7-12 High District

cname

Char

15

County name

dname

Char

30

District name

pi_status

Char

10

Indicates whether the Local Educational Agency (LEA) is in Program Improvement (PI) (In PI or Not in PI)

pi_imple Char
10
Indicates the LEA's first year of implementing PI requirements

pi_prior

Char

10

Indicates the LEA's placement under No Child Left Behind (NCLB) for 2011–2012 (Year 1, Year 2, or Year 3)

pi_place

Char

10

Indicates the LEA's placement under NCLB for 2012–2013 (Year 1, Year 2, or Year 3)

pi_exit Char
10
The year the LEA exited PI (the last year the LEA implemented PI activities)

ela_met_11

Char

5

Met LEA-wide Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) English-Language Arts (ELA) criteria in 2011 - includes participation rate and proficiency criteria (Yes, No, YMA=Yes met on Appeal, or N/A)

mth_met_11

Char

5

Met LEA-wide AYP Math criteria in 2011 - includes participation rate and proficiency criteria (Yes, No, YMA=Yes met on Appeal, or N/A)

api_11

Char

5

Met LEA-wide Academic Performance Index (API) criteria in 2011 (Yes, No, YMA=Yes met on Appeal, or N/A)

grad_11

Char

5

Met LEA-wide Graduation in 2011 (Yes, No, YMA=Yes Met on Appeal, or N/A)

ela_met_12

Char

5

Met LEA-wide AYP ELA criteria in 2012 - includes participation rate and proficiency criteria (Yes, No, YMA=Yes met on Appeal, or N/A)

mth_met_12

Char

5

Met LEA-wide AYP Math criteria in 2012 - includes participation rate and proficiency criteria (Yes, No, YMA=Yes met on Appeal, or N/A)

api_12

Char

5

Met LEA-wide API criteria in 2012 (Yes, No, YMA=Yes met on Appeal, or N/A)

grad_12

Char

5

Met LEA-wide Graduation in 2012 (Yes, No, YMA=Yes met on Appeal, or N/A)

spc_cond Char
2
Special Conditions (FF= District that had break in Title I funding but resumed taking Title I funds last year retains previous Program Improvement (PI) status and placement year (flip flop policy), P2= District lacks AYP data to evaluate PI status and placement during initial data release (P1) and is being held in former PI status and placement until AYP data becomes available (P2).)
Questions: PI Accountability Team | PIaccountability@cde.ca.gov | 916-319-0869 
Download Free Readers