Skip to main content
California Department of Education Logo

Glossary for the 2005 APR-AYP Overview

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Overview section of the glossary for the 2005 Accountability Progress Report (APR).

This glossary defines key terms shown on the AYP Overview sub-report of the 2005 Accountability Progress Report. Terms described below are listed in the order in which they appear on the sub-report.

Federal Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

The federal No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 requires that California determine whether or not each public school and local educational agency (LEA) is making Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP).

Made AYP

This item indicates whether the school or LEA made AYP for 2005. The possible values are "Yes" or "No." The report for a school or an LEA displays a "Yes" only if the school or LEA met all of its AYP criteria for 2005, including requirements for numerically significant subgroups. "No" means results for at least one or more criteria were below the 2005 targets.

Met ___ of ___ AYP Criteria

This item indicates how many of the AYP criteria were met. Depending on the number of numerically significant subgroups, a school or LEA may be required to meet up to 46 AYP criteria (22 for participation rate, 22 for percent proficient, 1 for API, and 1 for graduation rate). An "N/A" or "—" is not counted as one of the AYP criteria.

Met AYP Criteria

AYP criteria encompass four areas: participation rate, percent proficient (also referred to as Annual Measurable Objectives or AMOs), API as an additional indicator for AYP, and graduation rate. Each of these four areas has specific requirements. Participation rate and percent proficient criteria must be met in both ELA and in mathematics.

"Yes" in a column means that all criteria for the area were met. "No" in a column means one or more criteria for the area were not met. "Yes by Appeal" in a column means the school or LEA met the criteria based on approval of its appeal. If Graduation Rate shows "N/A," it means the school or LEA did not have students enrolled in grades nine through twelve.

  • The 2005 AYP Criteria Summary provides further description of 2005 AYP criteria for schools and LEAs.
  • Detailed descriptions of AYP criteria and calculation are provided in the 2005 Accountability Progress Report Information Guide on pages 42-63.
Participation Rate

The Participation Rate is the rate at which students participated in the assessments used to determine the percentage of students at or above the proficient level in ELA and mathematics. The assessments used were the 2005 California Standards Tests (CSTs), grades two through eight; 2005 California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA), grades two through eight and ten; and the 2005 California High School Exit Examination (CAHSEE), grade ten. The participation rate target is 95 percent. 

  • Detailed information about participation rate criteria and calculation is provided in the 2005 Accountability Progress Report Information Guide on pages 50-51.
Percent Proficient

Schools, LEAs, and numerically significant subgroups must meet percent proficient targets (or AMOs) in ELA and mathematics on the assessments used in AYP calculations. The assessments used were the 2005 California Standards Tests (CSTs), grades two through eight; 2005 California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA), grades two through eight and ten; and the 2005 California High School Exit Examination (CAHSEE), grade ten.

  • Detailed information about percent proficient criteria and calculation is provided in the 2005 Accountability Progress Report Information Guide on pages 51-55.
API - Additional Indicator for AYP

The API is used to meet part of the federal AYP requirements under NCLB. The federal API requirements differ from the state API requirements. Under federal requirements, a school or LEA must have a minimum API of 590 OR have at least one point growth in the API in addition to meeting the other federal AYP targets (participation rate, percent proficient, and graduation rate) in order to make AYP for 2005.

  • A detailed description of the API as an additional indicator for AYP criteria is provided in the 2005 Accountability Progress Report Information Guide on page 56.
Graduation Rate

This Graduation Rate calculation corresponds to the National Center for Educational Statistics (NCES) four-year completion rate. This rate includes information on high school graduates and high school dropouts aggregated over a four-year period. To meet the 2005 graduation rate criteria for AYP, a school or LEA must have a graduation rate of at least 82.9 percent, OR improvement in the graduation rate of at least 0.1 from the previous year, OR improvement in the graduation rate of at least 0.2 in the average two year rate. Graduation rates are calculated and displayed on the 2005 Accountability Progress Report with as few as one student in grades nine through twelve.

  • A detailed description of graduation rate for AYP criteria is provided in the 2005 Accountability Progress Report Information Guide on pages 57-60.
Groups

Under NCLB, not only schools and LEAs as a whole must meet AYP requirements but also numerically significant subgroups within those schools and LEAs.   

A subgroup is defined as numerically significant for participation rate if it has 100 or more students enrolled OR 50 or more students enrolled who make up at least 15 percent of the total enrollment. 

A subgroup is defined as numerically significant for percent proficient if it has 100 or more students with valid scores OR 50 or more students with valid scores who make up at least 15 percent of the total valid scores.

The subgroups for AYP include:

  • Ethnic/racial subgroups
  • Socioeconomically disadvantaged (SED) students
    These are students both of whose parents/guardians have not received a high school diploma or students who participate in the free or reduced-price lunch program.
  • English Learners
    These include student records marked as English learners as well as those marked as Redesignated Fluent English Proficient who have not scored proficient or above on the California Standards Test in English-language arts for three years.
  • Students with Disabilities
    These are students who receive special education services and have a valid disability code.

For Program Improvement (PI) determination, a Targeted Assistance School (TAS) may have requirements for numerically significant subgroups WITHIN the SED subgroup.

  • Detailed information about student subgroups used in AYP is provided in the 2005 Accountability Progress Report Information Guide on pages 66-67.
Met 2005 AYP Criteria

For the participation rate or for percent proficient in a content area (ELA and mathematics), the possible values are:

Yes = Met the criterion
No = Did not meet criterion
--   = Not applicable

The criteria are applied schoolwide, LEA-wide, and to subgroups, including the subgroups within the SED subgroup for a TAS. Because of concerns for student confidentiality, the number and percentage of students at or above proficient are not shown for a school, LEA, or subgroup if the number of valid scores is less than 11.

  • A detailed description of participation rate criteria is provided in the 2005 Accountability Progress Report Information Guide on pages 50-51.
  • A detailed description of percent proficient criteria is provided in the 2005 Accountability Progress Report Information Guide on pages 51-55.
Questions: Academic Accountability Team | aau@cde.ca.gov | 916-319-0863 
Last Reviewed: Friday, October 23, 2015

Share this Page

Recently Posted in Accountability

  • RELEASE: 2014–15 TITLE III ACCOUNTABILITY REPORTS (added 05-Feb-2016)
    Letter announcing the 2014-15 Title III Accountability Reports are now available
  • CALPADS AYP LEA and School Detail Report (added 05-Feb-2016)
    Detail overview of the California Longitudinal Pupil Achievement Data System (CALPADS) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Detail Report available for local educational agencies (LEAs) and schools.
  • AYP Reports in the CALPADS for Data Corrections (DOC) (added 05-Feb-2016)
    Overview of the two Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Reports in the California Longitudinal Pupil Achievement Data System (CALPADS) and how to leverage these reports to correct demographic, program participation, and enrollment
  • CALPADS AYP LEA and School Detail Report ? AYP (DOC) (added 05-Feb-2016)
    Detail overview of the California Longitudinal Pupil Achievement Data System (CALPADS) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Detail Report available for local educational agencies (LEAs) and schools.
  • CALPADS AYP LEAs and Schools Summary Report (DOC) (added 05-Feb-2016)
    Detailed overview of the California Longitudinal Pupil Achievement Data System (CALPADS) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Summary Report available for local educational agencies (LEAs) and schools.

  • CALPADS AYP LEAs and Schools Summary Report (added 05-Feb-2016)
    Detailed overview of the California Longitudinal Pupil Achievement Data System (CALPADS) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Summary Report available for local educational agencies (LEAs) and schools.
  • Record Layout for 2014-15 Title III Research File (added 03-Feb-2016)
    Record Layout for 2014-15 Title III Research File
  • SARC Coordinator FAQs (added 29-Jan-2016)
    Frequently asked questions (FAQs) regarding the School Accountability Report Card (SARC) by SARC Coordinators.
  • 2014-15 SARC Data Layout (DOC) (added 16-Dec-2015)
    School Accountability Report Card (SARC) Data Layout used to map field names to descriptive labels for each table.
  • 2015 Appeal Form (DOC) (added 15-Dec-2015)
    School and Local Educational Agency Appeal Form for the 2015 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results.