Alternative Payment Program Stakeholder GroupThe Alternative Payment Program Stakeholder Group shall identify existing requirements for the administration of the programs, examine the current requirements, existing protocols, and identifying efficiencies in program administration.
Assembly Bill (AB) 104 required the California Department of Education (CDE) to convene, by September 2015, a stakeholder group, composed by as specified State Agency Designees, Direct Service Program Providers, and Alternative Payment Program Providers, to provide recommendations to streamline data and other reporting requirements for child care and early learning providers that contract with the department as well as to examine CalWORKs Stage 2, CalWORKs Stage 3, and alternative payment program child care contract requirements, program and fiscal audits, and the process by which contractors are informed of and implement new contract requirements, with the purpose of identifying redundancies and efficiencies in program implementation and reducing the workload in program administration, as specified.
The membership of the Alternative Payment Program Stakeholder Group must include no more than seven members: a representative from the California Department of Social Services, First 5 California, and the CDE, as well as four representatives from Alternative Payment Programs (representing the geographic diversity of California).
Per AB 104, interested parties were encouraged to apply to be representatives on this stakeholder group. A diverse selection of candidates was chosen by the CDE based on the guidelines outlined by AB 104 and their location throughout the state of California to encourage full geographical representation. Applicants chosen were limited to those who applied.
AB 104 Timeline
September 1, 2015
State Department of Education shall convene a stakeholder group
March 1, 2016
Stakeholder group shall make a draft of its findings available to the Department of Finance and the Governor’s State Advisory Council for Early Learning and Care for review and comment
April 1, 2016
Stakeholder group shall provide its recommendations to the Legislature, Department of Finance, and State Board of Education
Who Should Attend?
Attendees are limited to the stakeholders who applied and were chosen. Meeting notes will be posted below.
Alternative Payment Program Stakeholder Group Members
- Sarah Neville-Morgan, Director, Early Learning and Care Division, California Department of Education
- Camille Maben, Executive Director, First 5 California
- Kim Johnson, Branch Chief, Child Care Refugee Programs Branch, California Department of Social Services
- Marco Jimenez, Program Manager, Early Education and Administration, Central Valley Children's Services Network
- Jeffrey Moreira, Case Management Manager, Crystal Stairs, Inc.
- Alfredo Villasenor, Executive Director, Community Child Care Council of Santa Clara County, Inc.
- Joie Owen, Family Services Division Manager, Glenn County Office of Education
Alternative Payment Program Stakeholder Group Meeting Notes and Information
- September 9, 2015 Meeting Notes
- October 12, 2015
- November 13, 2015 Meeting Notes
- December 11, 2015 Meeting Notes
- January 11, 2016 Meeting Notes
- February 8, 2016 Meeting Notes
- February 22, 2016 Meeting Notes
- March 14, 2016 Meeting Notes
The stakeholder groups planned eight meetings between September 2015, and March 2016. Both stakeholder groups agreed to meet as one entity and consolidate their recommendations into a single document. Draft recommendations were submitted to the California Department of Finance (DOF) and the Governor's State Advisory Council for Early Learning and Care for review and comment on March 1, 2016. Finalized recommendations were submitted to the Legislature, the DOF, and the State Board of Education on April 1, 2016.
The recommendations of the combined group are located on the Final AB 104 Recommendations (XLS) document. In addition, the groups recommend that four additional stakeholder groups be created to effectively streamline administrative burden: (1) Non-Compliant Families and Providers, (2) Alignment of Administrative Priorities for Stage 1 and Stage 2, (3) Single Rate Structure, and (4) Alternative Payment Administration and Case Management.