Reclassification

Reclassification Criteria

The reclassification criteria set forth in California EC Section 313 and 5 CCR Section 11303 remain unchanged. LEAs should continue using the following four criteria to establish reclassification policies and procedures:

Criterion 1: Assessment of English Language Proficiency

Assessment of language proficiency using an objective assessment instrument, including, but not limited to, the English language development test that is developed pursuant to EC Section 60810 :

• The English Language Proficiency Assessments for California (ELPAC) constitute the required state assessments for English language proficiency (ELP) administered to students whose primary language is a language other than English.
  • The ELPAC Overall Performance Level (PL) 4 was approved by the State Board of Education as the statewide standardized ELP criterion (1). LEAs shall use ELPAC Overall PL 4 to determine whether a student has met that criterion.
  • In practice, this means that all students with an ELPAC Overall PL 4 are eligible to be considered for reclassification in conjunction with other locally determined criteria.
  • Annual assessments continue until the pupil is redesignated as English proficient.
  • Some EL students with unique needs, or dually-identified students, may need specific considerations for this criterion as described in the student’s individualized learning plan (IEP); see the "Establishing Criteria" tab.

Resources to Support Criterion 1

• The CDE ELPAC Web Page
  The ELPAC web page provides information and links regarding the ELPAC and additional resources.
• 2021‒22 ELPAC Information Guide (DOCX)
  The ELPAC Information Guide includes reclassification guidance for LEAs and information about ELPAC implementation.
• ELPAC Test Administration Coordination Website
  The ELPAC website, maintained by Educational Testing Services, serves as the portal for resources that an LEA will need to administer the ELPAC.
• California Practitioners' Guide for Educating English Learners with Disabilities (PDF)
  The California Practitioners' Guide for Educating English Learners with Disabilities is a guide to identifying, assessing, supporting, and reclassifying English learners with unique needs.

Criterion 2: Teacher Evaluations

Teacher evaluations, including, but not limited to, a review of the pupil's curriculum mastery:

• This criterion remains locally determined and LEAs should continue using teacher evaluations per local policy to establish reclassification policies and procedures for Criterion 2.
• The CDE is in the process of developing a standardized resource for this criterion. The Observation Protocol for Teachers of English Learners (OPTEL) is an observation protocol currently under development to meet the requirements of EC Section 313.3 .

Resources to Support Criterion 2

• Addressing Unfinished Learning After COVID-19 School Closures (Council of the Great City Schools, 2020) (PDF)
  This resource presents an instructional framework for addressing unfinished learning and learning loss.
• RESTART & RECOVERY: Assessment Considerations for Fall 2020 (Marion et al., 2020) (PDF)
  This paper discusses assessment considerations for fall 2020, focusing on specific use-cases associated with key education stakeholders.
• Discerning—and Fostering—What English Learners Can Do with Language (Molle, Linquanti, MacDonald & Cook, 2016) (PDF)
  This guidance covers gathering and interpreting complementary evidence of classroom language uses for reclassification decisions.
• Webinar Series: Supporting Multilingual and English Learner Students During Distance Learning (Region 15 Comprehensive Center, the California Teachers Association, and the CDE, 2020)
  This WestEd web page provides guidance on how LEAs can use California's approved assessments to evaluate where students are academically at the start of and throughout the school year.
• Guidance on Diagnostic and Formative Assessments
  This CDE web page provides guidance on how LEAs can use California's approved assessments to evaluate where students are academically at the start of and throughout the school year.

Criterion 3: Parent Consultation

Parental opinion and consultation:

• This criterion remains locally determined for the 2020–21 school year and LEAs should continue using parental opinion and consultation per local policy to establish reclassification policies and procedures for Criterion 3.
• The CDE is in the process of developing a standardized resource for use when addressing this criterion. The OPTEL is an observation protocol currently under development to meet the conditions of California EC Section 313.3 .

Resources to Support Criterion 3

The following resources may be helpful for LEAs looking for tools to support parent consultations during the COVID-19 pandemic.

• English Learner Toolkit, Chapter 10: Ensuring Meaningful Communication with Limited English Proficient Parents (U.S. Department of Education, Office of English Language Acquisition, 2017) (PDF)
  This toolkit helps state and local educational agencies meet their obligations to English learners.
• Webinar Series: Supporting Multilingual and English Learner Students During Distance Learning (Region 15 Comprehensive Center, the California Teachers Association, and the CDE, 2020)
  This webinar series addresses the ways educators can support multilingual and English Learner students in distance learning.
  Distance Learning Parent Newsletter (CDE)
  The monthly Distance Learning Parent Newsletter provides information for parents regarding the education of their children and resources for parents. The newsletter is translated into the top five languages in the state.

Criterion 4: Basic Skills Relative to English Proficient Students

Comparison of the performance of the pupil in basic skills against an empirically established range of performance in basic skills based upon the performance of English proficient pupils of the same age, which demonstrates whether the pupil is sufficiently proficient in English to participate effectively in a curriculum designed for pupils of the same age whose native language is English:

• LEAs establish the empirical range of performance in basic skills when setting the locally established criteria for reclassification and consider the overall achievement goals set for all students. In doing so, the following definitions of related terms may be helpful:
  • Performance in basic skills: The score and/or performance level resulting from a recent administration of an objective assessment of basic skills in English (e.g., Smarter Balanced assessments, district benchmarks).
  • Range of performance in basic skills: A range of scores on the assessment of basic skills in English that corresponds to a performance level or a range of scores within a performance level.
  • Students of the same age: English-proficient students who are enrolled in the same grade as the student who is being considered for reclassification.

Resources to Support Criterion 4

The following resources may be helpful for LEAs looking for tools to support the basic skills criterion during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Smarter Balanced Website
The Smarter Balanced assessment system is designed to support instruction and give teachers better information about their students’ progress.

California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP)
Students in grades three through eight and grade eleven will receive full-length summative tests for both English language arts/literacy and mathematics, with approximately seven to eight hours of total testing time for each student.

State Board of Education Approved Content Standards
Content standards were designed to encourage the highest achievement of every student, by defining the knowledge, concepts, and skills that all students should acquire at each grade level.

Following the Reclassification Rainbow

As mentioned above, the reclassification rainbow reminds us to always consider all of the criteria when making reclassification decisions (Following the Reclassification Rainbow (PPTX)) for every eligible EL student, especially those who score at an ELPAC Overall PL 4.

LEAs should use the following process to conjunctively consider student results for all four reclassification criteria listed above.

1. Review student performance on Criterion 1: Assessment of ELP. A student's ELPAC score is the primary indicator of whether a student is ready for reclassification.
   • Students who score at ELPAC Overall PL 4 should be identified and considered for reclassification.
   • Students who score at ELPAC Overall PL 3 or lower should not be identified or considered for reclassification. However, LEAs are encouraged to convene stakeholders for a larger conversation to inform planning, placement, and personal goals for the short term and the next school year. These convenings should include parents whenever possible and focus on strengths, growth areas, and opportunities for the student.
2. Review student performance on Criterion 2: Teacher Evaluation and Criterion 4: Comparison of Performance in Basic Skills.
   • For students who score at ELPAC Overall PL 4, LEAs should establish a local policy and process to collect feedback on an eligible student’s mastery of the curriculum provided by that student’s teachers.
   • If other reclassification criteria suggest that a student who scored at ELPAC Overall PL 4 has learning deficits in other areas (or in certain linguistic subdomains within the ELPAC), decision-makers are encouraged to discuss these results with those who know the student (e.g., classroom teachers, parents, instructional specialists or coaches) to identify needed services and supports, so as not to preclude a student with unique needs from reclassification.
     • Please note, deficits in academic success, although currently unrelated to ELP, may indicate a student has incurred a deficit while learning English. Although this situation does not preclude a student from reclassification, the LEA is obligated to ensure the student is provided ongoing academic support, and any other necessary support, designed to recuperate and remedy any such deficits during the four-year RFEP monitoring period or beyond.
3. Address Criterion 3: Parent Opinion and Consultation by connecting with EL families to answer questions, discuss student performance on each criterion (Criteria 1–4), and set goals for the next school year. An interpreter should be provided for the parent when necessary.
   • For students who score at ELPAC Overall PL 4, LEAs are encouraged to convene interested parties (including the student's current teachers, teachers from the previous school year, and relevant academic coordinators) to discuss the eligible student's performance and recommend to parents goals for the next school year. These consultations should lead to a reclassification discussion, held prior to decisions, and includes parents of the eligible student. These discussions yield collaboratively developed ideas, plans, and decisions for any student change in classification and support to be provided during the four-year RFEP monitoring period.

Legislation

Reclassification procedures shall utilize multiple criteria in determining whether to reclassify a pupil as proficient in English, including, but not limited to, all of the following:

1. Assessment of language proficiency using an objective assessment instrument, including, but not limited to, the English language development test that is developed or acquired pursuant to Section 60810.
2. Teacher evaluation, including, but not limited to, a review of the pupil's curriculum mastery.
3. Parental opinion and consultation.
4. Comparison of the performance of the pupil in basic skills against an empirically established range of performance in basic skills based upon the performance of English proficient pupils of the same age, that demonstrates whether the pupil is sufficiently proficient in English to participate effectively in a curriculum designed for pupils of the same age whose native language is English.

EC Section 313(f)
English Language Proficiency (ELP) Assessment requirements are specified in California EC sections 313, 60810, and 60812.

EC Section 60810
California law requires that the assessment for initial identification of an English learner and the summative assessment shall include, but not be limited to, an assessment of achievement of these pupils in English reading, speaking, and written skills.

Considerations for Establishing Criteria

Considerations Around Criterion 1 for the 2020–21 School Year

In a letter to the field dated July 1, 2020, the CDE provided the following Coronavirus (COVID-19) reclassification guidance for Criterion 1:

• For those students who completed testing in 2019–20, LEAs will use the results from the 2019–20 Summative English Language Proficiency Assessments for California (ELPAC) to determine reclassification eligibility.
• For those students who did not complete testing in the spring of 2019–20, an optional fall Summative ELPAC (PDF) window was open and available for reclassification purposes between August 20–October 30, 2020, for students who would benefit from administration to support reclassification.
  • During this window, LEAs could administer the optional fall Summative ELPAC and use the results to meet criterion 1 eligibility for reclassification.
  • Administration of the optional fall Summative ELPAC was highly recommended for all EL students who have already met all other criteria (Criteria 2–4) in 2019–20 except criterion 1, particularly in grades four to eleven. Students were required to take the test form that aligned to their assigned academic grade-level in the 2019–20 school year.

With the possible exception of students with unique needs or who are dually identified, EL students who do not have an ELPAC score (from either the spring 2020 or fall 2020 administrations) are not eligible to be reclassified, even if they have met other locally-determined criteria.

Some EL students with unique needs or who are dually-identified students, may be unable to participate fully in the ELPAC without accommodations. In such instances, members of the student's individualized education program (IEP) team should confer to document and discuss how the student's unique needs affect their ability to obtain an Overall PL 4 and whether reclassification should be considered on the basis of the local alternative assessment information based on the student's specific needs and abilities.

Considerations Around Criterion 2 for the 2020–21 School Year

If it is not possible to use the same process or instrument as in previous years, LEAs may adopt or create a process or instrument for educators to use to provide feedback focused on student support and mastery in the current school year. For example, teachers may provide feedback on their EL students' curriculum mastery in the first unit of the 2020–21 school year with a focus on potential supports necessary for each student to succeed in rigorous, grade-level learning for the remainder of the year.

It is possible that teachers may have had less synchronous instruction and follow-up contact with students during spring 2020 distance learning schedules, making it difficult for them to provide judgments about their EL students' curriculum mastery. It is also likely that all students, EL students and non-EL students alike, mastered less of their grade-level academic curriculum in the 2019–20 school year than usual due to disruptions from the COVID-19 pandemic. Experts in the field of teaching, learning, and assessment generally encourage educators to use an asset-based approach to student placement and assessment in the fall of 2020 as presented in two guidance documents: Addressing Unfinished Learning After COVID-19 School Closures (PDF), from the Council for Great City Schools (PDF), and Restart & Recovery: Assessment Considerations for Fall 2020 (PDF), from the Council of Chief State School Officers (PDF).  

In practice, this means focusing less on what students failed to learn in 2019–20 and focusing more on how educators can assist students to progress toward grade-level in content learning. If an LEA's current process or tool for this criterion does not match or encourage this asset-based approach, an LEA can modify their approach for the 2020–21 school year to ensure that student information received supporting Criterion 2 is constructive and supportive during monitoring.

Considerations Around Criterion 3 for the 2020–21 School Year

Parents have been asked to take on new responsibilities and levels of engagement in their children's education in 2020. These new responsibilities are often concurrent with changes in parents' own working conditions and environments. Against this backdrop, it may be particularly difficult to engage with families that face challenges in terms of technology access, ELP, or financial stability during the 2020–21 school year. Access issues should not, however, become a justification for failing to connect with parents.

LEAs must think strategically about connecting with parents, including through alternative means (e.g., direct phone calls; one-on-one conferences) if needed. If it is not possible to use the same process or instrument as in previous years, LEAs can reach out to parents of all students eligible for reclassification to consult via phone, virtual school platforms, or other technology that is available to parents. This gives parents the opportunity to discuss progress and data to voice any concerns and questions about their child's likely reclassification. Hearing parent concerns, responding to their questions, and then collaboratively identifying strategies to address those questions is an appropriate use of parent consultation time.

When consulting with parents regarding reclassification in the 2020–21 school year, LEAs should focus on the information that makes the student eligible, any necessary supports for the student to succeed in rigorous, grade-level learning, and how to monitor and meet these needs via the RFEP monitoring process. Parents may also have questions about how the school's instructional environments and supports will continue to benefit the student's academic success or the benefits of remote vs. in-person learning. For this reason, it can be productive to ensure that parent consultations involve everyone who knows and will be supporting the student in the coming school year: parents, decision-makers, as well as all relevant teachers and support staff.

Considerations Around Criterion 4 for the 2020–21 School Year

In a letter to the field dated July 1, 2020, the CDE provided the following COVID-19 reclassification guidance for Criterion 4:

• For all grade levels, LEAs can use the most recent local assessments or the Smarter Balanced Summative English language arts assessments.

Because of COVID-19, it is likely that many LEAs will not use their currently established standards for Criterion 4 in the 2020–21 school year because Smarter Balanced and/or LEA local assessments were not administered to all students. If it is not possible to use the same process or instrument as in previous years, LEAs should keep in mind that:

• EC Section 313(f)(4) calls for a comparison of student performance in basic skills against an empirically established range of performance in basic skills based on the performance of English proficient students of the same age, and that
• California regulations—5 CCR sections 11303 (Reclassification) and 11308[c][6] (Advisory Committee)—specify that any local reclassification criteria must be reviewed by a school district committee on programs and services for English learner students, such as the District English Learner Advisory Committee.

In light of the law and regulations, LEAs that cannot use their current instruments or standards for Criterion 4 will need to provide empirical evidence to support their current selection of assessments and the range of performance for 2020–21, including approval from the school district committee on programs and services for English learners.

LEAs also have been advised that local assessments can be used to identify English learners who meet academic measures indicating they are ready to be reclassified. Scores and performance information from locally administered assessments and other measures used to meet Criterion 4 should be used in a similar fashion to Criteria 2 and 3—as constructive information to further inform supports for the student during future RFEP monitoring, but not as a barrier to reclassification.

Letters to the Field

Reclassification Guidance for 2020–21 and Statewide Testing Window Extension (June 14, 2021)
This letter provides continued reclassification guidance and notifies LEAs of adjustments to the Summative ELPAC testing schedule.

COVID-19 Reclassification Guidance for 2019–20 and Fall Administration (July 1, 2020)
This letter provides guidance regarding ELPAC testing and reclassifying students from English learner to fluent English proficient status for 2019–20.

Letter to Local Educational Agencies Regarding the Monitoring of Reclassified Students (December 20, 2019)
This letter reminds LEAs about requirements of monitoring reclassified students.

Reclassification Guidance for 2019–20 (September 2, 2019)
This letter provides guidance to LEAs regarding reclassifying students from English learner to fluent English proficient status.

Updated Letter to Local Educational Agencies Regarding Reclassification Guidance for 2018–19 (January 18, 2019)
This letter updates the guidance previously provided to local educational agencies regarding reclassifying students from English learner to fluent English proficient status.

Letter to Local Educational Agencies Regarding Interim Reclassification Guidance for 2018–19 (September 14, 2018)
This letter updates to interim guidance provided to LEAs regarding reclassifying students from English learner to fluent English proficient status.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) and Additional Resources

Reclassification FAQs
The above link provides frequently asked questions regarding English learner reclassification.

Surveying the Landscape of California’s English Learner Reclassification Policy
This report shares results from a survey of district policies for measuring English learner progress and for removing the English learner designation, before and during school closures due to COVID-19.

English Learners Resources Web Page
The above link provides FAQs regarding English learners in California and appropriate teacher authorizations and links to websites with information about developing programs for linguistically and culturally diverse students.

Federal Program Monitoring (FPM) Instrument California Department of Education (CDE) Web Page
The California Department of Education Monitoring Tool (CMT) is a web-based system, which allows LEAs to facilitate a response to state and federal requirements for program monitoring.

U.S. Department of Education English Learner Toolkit Web Page
Office of English Language Acquisition’s EL Tool Kit was published in 2015 as a companion to support the January 7, 2015 Dear Colleague Letter (PDF) produced by the Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights, and the Department of Justice, outlining legal obligations for English learner students. Some chapters of the tool kit have been updated related to the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) of 2015.