Skip to main content
California Department of Education Logo

Management Bulletin 10-02

Early Education and Support Division

Subject: Enrollment Priority for Siblings

Number: 10-02

Date: January 7, 2010

Expires: Until Rescinded

Authority: California Education Code (EC), Sections 8200, 8201, 8202(c), 8208(j), 8227, and 8263.

ATTENTION: Executive Officers and Program Directors of all Child Care and Development Programs and all Centralized Eligibility List Administrators


The purpose of this Management Bulletin is to clarify enrollment priority for siblings from families who have been certified by a child care and development contractor.


In 2005, legislation was enacted that required each county to design, maintain, and administer a countywide centralized eligibility list (CEL). California Education Code (EC), Section 8227(e) requires that all child development contractors, with specific exceptions (campus and migrant child care and development programs pursuant to EC sections 66060 and 8230 and programs serving severely handicapped children pursuant to EC Section 8250), participate and use the CEL to fill vacancies and utilize funding in their child development programs. The development of county CELs ranked families according to the priorities in EC, Section 8263, with first priority being given to children receiving protective services or at risk of abuse, neglect and exploitation, and all other eligible families ranked according to income. In addition, a “super-rank” or higher priority was added that provided the highest priority for enrollment to unserved siblings of eligible families who had one or more children enrolled in an Early Education and Support Division (EESD) program. However, our research on admission priorities has found there is no legal authority to provide siblings with a priority to all EESD programs in a county over other eligible children.


EC Section 8263(b)(1)(A) reads in part, first priority shall be given to neglected or abused children who are recipients of child protective services, or children who are at risk of being neglected or abused, upon a written referral from a legal, medical, or social services agency. 

Additionally, EC Section 8263(b)(2) reads, in part, second priority shall be given to income eligible families. Within this priority, families with the lowest rank as determined by the income ranking schedule at, shall be admitted first. If two or more families are in the same rank, the family that has a child with exceptional needs shall be admitted first. If there is no family with a child with exceptional needs, the same rank family that has been on the waiting list the longest shall be admitted first.


To meet the family’s need for care, when a contractor is serving one (or more) child(ren) in a family and a vacancy occurs in any of that agency’s contracts that would serve the family’s other child(ren), that agency may enroll the family’s other child(ren). However, depending on the contract type and services offered, a contractor may not be able to enroll all of a family’s children. For example:

  • A contractor may not have the contract type that allows the contractor to serve the child’s sibling.
  • A contractor may not have an available vacancy.

When this occurs, the family remains on the CEL ranked in priority order per EC, Section 8263(b). The siblings not being served are not given a “super-rank” or super priority over all the other children on the CEL.

If you have any questions regarding the admission of siblings, please contact your assigned Field Services Consultant at

This Management Bulletin is mandatory only to the extent that it cites a specific statutory and/or regulatory requirement. Any portion of this Management Bulletin that is not supported by a specific statutory and/or regulatory requirement is not prescriptive pursuant to California Education Code Section 33308.5.

Questions:   Early Education and Support Division | 916-322-6233
Last Reviewed: Friday, November 6, 2015
Recently Posted in Child Development
  • AAV of Exhibits 3.18 and 3.26 (added 17-Oct-2016)
    Accessible alternative version (AAV) of Exhibits 3.18 and 3.26 in the evaluation report of the RTT-ELC QRIS.
  • Minimum Wage Increase Task Force Meeting Agenda (added 11-Oct-2016)
    Agenda for the October 24, 2016 meeting arranged by the State Advisory Council regarding the Minimum Wage Increase.
  • SAC Meeting Dates and Locations (updated 11-Oct-2016)
    Proposed dates and locations of future meetings for the State Advisory Council on Early Learning and Care (SAC).
  • Management Bulletin 16-16 (added 11-Oct-2016)
    Management Bulletins issued by the Early Education and Support Division to clarify regulations and statutes.
  • Management Bulletin 16-11 (added 05-Oct-2016)
    Management Bulletin 16-11 is in regard to a Standard Reimbursement Rate Increase for Fiscal Year 2016-17.

  • Management Bulletin 16-10 (added 05-Oct-2016)
    Management Bulletins issued by the Early Education and Support Division to clarify regulations and statutes.
  • RTT-ELC Evaluation Brief (PDF) (added 20-Sep-2016)
    Brief summary of the evaluation report for the Race to the Top-Early Learning Challenge (RTT-ELC) Quality Rating and Improvement System (QRIS).
  • Management Bulletin 16-12 (added 16-Sep-2016)
    This page contains information on Management Bulletin 16-12.
  • LPC County Priorities (XLS) (added 09-Sep-2016)
    LPC County Priorities for CCTR and CSPP contract types for child development programs.
  • Child Counts by program for Oct 2015 and Apr 2016 (XLS) (added 07-Sep-2016)
    This report contains information on the average number of children served in October 2015 and April 2016 by program and age.