Skip to content
Printer-friendly version

Food Service Management Procurement

School food authority (SFA) requirements and regulations for the procurement of services offered by a food service management company (FSMC).

Introduction

The tabs below provide guidance and information for SFAs on soliciting bids from and contracting with an FSMC or a meal vendor. Subtopics under the tabs below include free and open competition; informal and formal procurement; bid thresholds; volunteer group involvement; the CDE review and approval process, and other topics relevant to the food service operation and contracting with a food service management company. The Resources tab includes a sample Request for Proposal (RFP) and model fixed-fee contract that SFAs may use when procuring the services of an FSMC. The School Food Service Contracts Unit (SFSCU) will add more RFP and contract samples as they are developed.

For assistance with the procurement process or for related questions, SFAs can contact the SFSCU by phone at 916-319-0636, or toll-free at 800-952-5609. Send questions or documents by e-mail to the SFSCU at SFSCONTRACTS@cde.ca.gov. You can also find the Contract Specialist assigned to your county on the Resources tab.

 

Definitions

Food Service Management Company  

National School Lunch Program regulations under Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations (7 CFR),  Section 210.2 define a food service management company (FSMC) as “a commercial enterprise or a nonprofit organization which is or may be contracted with by school food authority [SFA] to manage any aspect of the school food service.” A company is considered an FSMC if it performs all or a combination of the following services:

  • Providing consulting services
  • Developing menus and menu production records
  • Preparing, delivering, and/or serving meals
  • Organizing and maintaining program documents (such as daily meal counts, menus, and menu production records)
  • Preparing claims for SFA approval and submission
  • Purchasing food, supplies, and/or equipment
  • Providing program guidance and training
  • Maintaining bookkeeping records
  • Implementing other activities that would normally be performed by the SFA

Meal Vendor

Companies preparing and delivering meals to SFAs are meal vendors. In this capacity, a meal vendor may also develop menus and menu production records. Should additional services be provided, such as the activities listed under the FSMC definition above (usually performed by the SFA when contracting with a meal vendor), such services may constitute food service management and would need to be solicited and procured as such.

Meal vendors may not access individual student meal eligibility information, collect meal payments, conduct point of service meal counts, provide program oversight, collect claim data, or act as an employee of or agent for the SFA.

Net Cash Resources

According to 7 CFR, Section 210.2, net cash resources means all monies (as determined by the California School Accounting Manual), that are available or have accrued to an SFA’s nonprofit school food service at any given time, less cash payable. Such monies may include, but are not limited to, cash on hand, cash receivables, earnings on investments, cash on deposit, and the value of stocks, bonds, or other negotiable securities.

Nonprofit School Food Service (or Cafeteria) Account and Revenues

Federal regulations in 7 CFR, Section 210.2, define the nonprofit school food service (or cafeteria) account and revenues as follows:

. . . the restricted account in which all of the revenue from all food service operations conducted by the school food authority principally for the benefit of school children is retained and used only for the operation or improvement of the nonprofit school food service. This account shall include, as appropriate, non-Federal funds used to support paid lunches as provided in [7 CFR, Section] 210.14(e), and proceeds from non-program foods as provided in [7 CFR, Section] 210.14(f). . . .

Revenue, when applied to nonprofit school food service, means all monies received by or accruing to the nonprofit school food service in accordance with the State agency's established accounting system including, but not limited to, children's payments, earnings on investments, other local revenues, State revenues, and Federal cash reimbursements.

New and accrued revenues may include, but are not limited to, federal and state meal reimbursements, meal payments from children and adults, money received from a la carte and vending machine food sales, and catering activities.

School Food Authority

The term SFA, as defined in 7 CFR, Section 210.2, means the governing body responsible for the administration of one or more schools that has the legal authority to operate the federal school meal programs or is otherwise approved by the U.S. Department of Agriculture to operate such programs.

 

Procurement

Open and Free Competition Requirement  

Both federal regulations and California state laws require all procurements—without regard to dollar value—to be conducted in a manner that promotes maximum open and free competition. School food authorities (SFA) must conduct either a formal or an informal bidding process.

According to Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations (7 CFR), Section 3016.36(c)(1), situations limiting competition include, but are not limited to:

  1. Placing unreasonable requirements on firms in order for them to qualify to do business
  2. Requiring unnecessary experience and excessive bonding
  3. Noncompetitive pricing practices between firms or between affiliated companies
  4. Noncompetitive awards to consultants that are on retainer contracts
  5. Organizational conflicts of interest
  6. Requiring a specific brand name product, rather than allowing products of equal value to be offered
  7. Any arbitrary action in the procurement process

Any action that diminishes open and free competition undermines the integrity of the procurement process and may subject the SFA to bid protests. Pursuant to 7 CFR, Section 3016.36(b)(12), SFAs must have protest procedures in place to handle and resolve disputes about their procurements and must, in all instances, disclose information regarding any protests to the California Department of Education (CDE).

SFAs may not enter into a contract prepared by a bidder. Federal regulations in 7 CFR, sections 3016.60(b) and 3019.43, prohibit sponsors from awarding a contract to any contractor that prepares or has a significant role in developing the contract and related bid documents; e.g., a price quote, Request for Proposal (RFP), Invitation for Bid (IFB), or bid specifications. After contract negotiations, the SFA (not the selected contractor) must incorporate all changes into the final contract.

SFAs receiving state funds also need to comply with California Public Contract Code (PCC), Section 20112.

Request for Proposal or Invitation for Bid  

Request for Proposal (RFP), also known as competitive proposals (7 CFR, Section 3016.36[d][3]), is a method of procurement whereby SFAs publicly solicit a technical proposal that explains how the prospective contractor will meet the objectives of the solicitation, and includes a cost element that identifies the costs to accomplish the technical proposal. While price alone is not the sole basis for award, it remains the primary consideration when awarding a contract under the RFP method. SFAs seeking proposals from a food service management company (FSMC) should use the RFP method of procurement.

Invitation for Bid (IFB), also known as competitive sealed bids, is a formal method of procurement in which SFAs publicly solicit sealed bids from an adequate number of known suppliers, with the goal of obtaining three bids at a minimum. The SFA must award the fixed-price contract to the lowest priced, most responsible bidder, whose bid is responsive, and conforms with all the material terms and conditions of the IFB. SFAs must allow bidders sufficient time to respond prior to the date set for opening the bids. SFAs seeking proposals from meal vendors should use the IFB method of procurement.

Regardless of the type of bid method an SFA uses, SFAs must award the contract to the lowest bidder who best meets the SFA’s needs and stated objectives. The SFA must retain all bidding documents for three years after the final contract payment and, in the event of an audit, three years beyond the final audit resolution.

The RFP and IFB are important documents for setting parameters and conditions for the resulting contract. The SFA should adhere to their existing procurement plan or procedures to ensure a consistent procurement process; if there are no procedures or plan currently in place, the SFA should develop a procurement plan or procedure. Preparing and issuing an RFP or IFB includes the following steps:

  1. Evaluating which types of services are needed and preparing a Scope of Work (SOW) that describes the services and tasks or products requested
  2. Drafting the RFP/IFB, which must include the SOW and a sample contract
  3. Submitting the RFP/IFB to the CDE for review and approval prior to publishing (SFAs should allow 90 days for the CDE to review and approve)
  4. Providing the RFP/IFB to contractors known to offer the desired services or products
  5. Publicly advertising the RFP/IFB
  6. Establishing a date and time for opening proposals/bids
  7. Evaluating the proposals/bids
  8. Submitting the negotiated contract and all bidding documents to the CDE for review and approval (allow 30 days); this is not required for an IFB procurement
  9. Awarding the contract and publicly posting the outcome of the RFP/IFB

Procurement History and Records

As required by 7 CFR, sections 3016.36(b)(9) and 3019.54, SFAs and FSMCs must maintain records sufficient to detail the significant history of the procurement process. These records include, but are not limited to:

  • Public notice
  • RFP/IFB
  • Contract
  • Rationale for the method of procurement
  • Selection of contract type
  • Justification for lack of competition
  • Basis for contractor selection or rejection
  • Basis for award cost or price 

Bid Process for Food Service Management Company Contracts

FSMC contracts must be obtained through a competitive bidding process, using either formal or informal bidding procedures. SFAs must submit all bid documents to the CDE’s School Food Service Contracts Unit (SFSCU) for approval prior to issuance (7 CFR, sections 210.19[a][5] and 220.16[c][1]).

Bid documents can be sent to the SFSCU by e-mail at SFSCONTRACTS@cde.ca.gov, by fax at 916-445-5731, or by mail to:

School Food Service Contracts Unit
Nutrition Services Division
California Department of Education
1430 N Street, Suite 4503
Sacramento, CA 95814-5901

SFAs can also contact an SFSCU Contract Analyst for guidance and assistance with the procurement process. The form Caseload SNP for your county-assigned SFSCU Contract Analyst list is available from the Child Nutrition Information and Payment System under Applications/Download Forms.

For more guidance on contracting with an FSMC, please review the Approval and Resources tabs for federal regulations and policies; the U.S. Department of Agriculture Contracting with Food Service Management Companies: Guidance for School Food Authorities manual; and relevant CDE Management Bulletins.

Bid Process for Vended Meal Contracts

SFAs contracting for vended meals, which are usually limited to preparation and delivery, must prepare a written IFB and provide it to as many potential bidders as possible. Vended meal procurements must follow a competitive procurement process. The goal of an IFB is to obtain a minimum of three price quotes. SFAs may not bypass the competitive bidding process by entering into a contract as a result of negotiations with only one contractor/vendor.

At this time, SFAs contracting for vended meals do not need to submit bid documents to the CDE for prior approval; however, SFAs must submit a signed copy of the contract and annual contract extensions to the CDE.

Meal vendors may not:

  • Access individual student meal eligibility
  • Act as an employee of, or agent for, the SFA
  • Collect claim data
  • Collect meal payments
  • Conduct point of service meal counts
  • Provide program oversight
Upon request, SFAs shall make all bid documents available for review to the CDE, the USDA, and the USDA Office of Inspector General. The CDE retains the right to request bid documents from any SFA for prior approval (7 CFR, sections 210.21[c][1], 215.14a[c][1], and 220.16[c][1]).

 

Bid Thresholds

In all competitive procurements, school food authorities (SFA) will use federal, state, or local bid thresholds to determine whether to use the Formal Procurement or Informal Procurement process.

Current Bid Thresholds

Effective August 30, 2012, the current federal small purchase threshold is $150,000, as published in U.S. Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service Policy Memorandum SP 01-2013: Federal Small Purchase Threshold Adjustment. External link opens in new window or tab. (PDF)

The California state small purchase threshold, as established in California PCC, Section 20111(a), is adjusted annually (effective January 1) and published in the Bid Threshold Adjustment letter available on the California Department of Education Finance and Grants Correspondence Web page. The 2014 calendar year small purchase threshold is $84,100.

SFAs must adhere to the applicable bid threshold established by their governing body:

Nonprofit agencies and charter schools must use the federal small purchase threshold.
Public schools and county offices of education must use the California state small purchase threshold.
Local governments, such as those administered by county government offices, must use the small purchase threshold established by their governing body or the federal threshold of $150,000, if no local threshold exists.

Formal Procurement

A formal procurement process is primarily used to purchase food and/or services when the one-year procurement cost exceeds the applicable small purchase threshold. This situation applies to most contracts between SFAs and food service management companies. As part of the competitive bidding process, SFAs must issue and publicly advertise a Request for Proposal (RFP) or Invitation for Bid (IFB) for any procurement equal to or over the applicable small purchase threshold. For more details on the RFP and IFB method of procurement, see the Procurement tab.

Informal Procurement

An informal procurement process may be used when the one-year cost for the purchase of food, services, and/or supplies from a wholesaler, retailer, or vendor is less than the applicable small purchase threshold. Although less rigorous than the formal procurement method, SFAs must still use a competitive bidding process. The SFA must contact at least three known suppliers and obtain competitive price quotations. SFAs are permitted to negotiate prices and terms with one or more of the suppliers contacted. SFAs must ensure that all suppliers receive the same information about the requested food, services, and/or supplies. To the extent possible, SFAs should compare equivalent food, services, and/or supplies, and inform all suppliers of any special need that may affect the price. An example of a special need would be the delivery of the product to a specific building or kitchen.

Bid quotes initially obtained by phone must be documented in writing, with the bidder providing written confirmation about items or services to be provided and prices discussed; such documentation must be retained as part of the procurement documents and is subject to examination and audit by applicable federal and state regulatory agencies. 

Using the informal procurement method, SFAs may directly contact potential competitive sources. The decision whether to formally advertise or simply contact three or more potentially qualified sources is left to the SFA.

Please note that SFAs must always adhere to procurement regulations when purchasing any amount of goods or services using cafeteria funds. Both the formal and informal procurement processes must comply with all applicable federal and state regulations and guidance, and use:

  • A standard of conduct or guidelines for conducting compliant procurements; for example, any bidder who develops specifications, requirements, scope of work, RFPs or IFBs, contract terms and conditions, or other documents used in the resulting contract, is excluded from competing for the contract award
  • Open and full competition (7 CFR, Section 3016.36(c)]

 

Program Control

Overview

A school food authority (SFA) may contract with a food service management company (FSMC) to perform one or more of the following activities for the SFA’s nonprofit food service operation, at one or more of its schools (Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations [7 CFR], Section 210.16[a]): 

  • Providing consulting services

  • Developing menus and menu production records

  • Preparing, delivering, and/or serving meals

  • Organizing and maintaining program documents (such as daily meal counts, menus, and menu production records)

  • Preparing claims for reimbursement for SFA approval and submission per 7 CFR, Section 210.16(a)(5), FSMCs are not allowed to submit claims

  • Purchasing food, supplies, and/or equipment

  • Providing program guidance and training

  • Maintaining bookkeeping records

  • Implementing other activities normally performed by the SFA

SFAs must remain financially responsible for their school food service programs and retain control over the quality, extent, and general nature of their food service operations and the meal prices charged to children (7 CFR, Section 210.16[a][4]).

SFAs must also retain control of the SFA’s nonprofit school food service (cafeteria) account, development and adjustment of the 21-day cycle menu, signature authority on the SFA’s agreement with the California Department of Education, and the SFA’s Claims for Reimbursement (7 CFR, sections 210.3[d], 210.7, 210.8[a] and [b], 210.9[b][10], 210.10[a][3], 210.16[a], 220.7[d][1][iv] and [v], 220.10, and 220.11). 

In addition, SFAs shall:

  • Adhere to the procurement standards specified in 7 CFR, sections 210.21 and 220.16, 3016.36, 3016.60, and 3019.41–48, when contracting with an FSMC

  • Ensure that the food service operation conforms with the SFA’s Permanent Single Agreement with the CDE under the applicable school nutrition program

  • Monitor the food service operation through periodic on-site visits of all participating sites

No Adverse Impact to District Personnel

According to California Education Code (EC), sections 45103.1(a)(3) and 45103.5(b), contracting with an FSMC shall not adversely impact public school district personnel and positions; this means an FSMC may not replace any food service positions that have been in place since July 1, 1997, or reduce an existing food service position’s scope of responsibilities; in addition, an FSMC consultant(s) may not supervise district personnel.

A La Carte Food Services

According to 7 CFR, Section 210.16(a), no SFA may contract with an FSMC to operate an a la carte food service, unless the FSMC agrees to offer free, reduced-price, and paid reimbursable lunches to all eligible children.

Control of Cafeteria Account

The cafeteria account is a restricted account in which the SFA retains and expends its revenues only for the operation and improvement of the nonprofit school food service. SFAs shall not use funds from the cafeteria account to purchase land or buildings, or to construct buildings, unless otherwise approved by the U.S. Department of Agriculture; (7 CFR, sections 210.2 and 210.14[a]). Revenues that shall accrue to the cafeteria account include, but are not limited to, child and adult meal payments, earnings on investments, other local revenues, state revenues, and federal cash reimbursements (7 CFR, Section 210.2).

SFAs shall not allow non-district staff access to the cafeteria account. Pursuant to EC Section 38094, a district’s governing board shall designate custody and control of the cafeteria account to one or more district employees who shall be responsible for recording revenues and expenditures. Effective July 1, 2011, profit sharing between the food service and other district-associated bodies (e.g., student or parent groups) is not permitted (Public Law 111-296, Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010, sections 206 and 208). Amendments to the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act and the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 further require that all revenues from the sale of non-program foods accrue to the cafeteria account solely for the operation or improvement of the food service program. Pursuant to 7 CFR, Section 210.19(a)(1) SFAs:

. . .shall meet the requirements for the allowability of nonprofit school food service expenditures in accordance with this part and, 7 CFR part 3015 and 7 CFR part 3016, or 7 CFR part 3019, as applicable. All costs resulting from contracts that do not meet the requirements of this part are unallowable nonprofit school food service account expenses… .

Confidentiality and Disclosure of Eligibility Status

According to EC Section 49558, all applications and records related to free or reduced-price meal eligibility must be kept confidential, and may not be disclosed for any purpose not directly connected with the administration of any free or reduced-price meal program. In accordance with 7 CFR, Section 210.8(a)(5), and the CDE Permanent Single Agreement for Child Nutrition Programs, SFAs shall provide such application information and records, on request, to the CDE and USDA for audits or reviews.

An SFA shall not disclose a child’s eligibility status during the process of providing free and reduced-price meals. This includes any overt identification in regard to the free and reduced-price benefit notification, provision of meals in the cafeteria, point of sale  (POS) meal count, or method of payment.

In addition, EC Section 49557 and 7 CFR, Section 245.8, require SFAs to take all actions necessary to ensure compliance with the following nondiscrimination practices for children eligible to receive free and reduced-price meals or free milk:

  • The names of the children shall not be published, posted, or announced in any manner.

  • There shall be no overt identification of any of the children by the use of special tokens or tickets or by any other means.

  • The children shall not be required to work for their meals or milk.

  • The children shall not be required to use a separate dining area, go through a separate serving line, enter the dining area through a separate entrance, or consume their meals or milk at a different time.

  • When more than one lunch, breakfast, or type of milk is offered that meets the requirements in 7 CFR, sections 210.10 and 220.8, or the definition of milk in 7 CFR, Section 215.2, the children shall have the same choice of meals or milk available to children who pay the full price for meals or milk.

Volunteer Groups

SFAs shall promote activities to involve students and parents in the food service program. Allowable activities include menu planning, enhancement of the eating environment, program promotion, and related student–community support activities (7 CFR, Section 210.12[a]).

 

Approval Process

Overview

Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations (7 CFR), sections 210.16(a)(9) and (10), require school food authorities (SFA) to obtain written approval from the California Department of Education (CDE) for all Requests for Proposal (RFP) and contract documents before issuance and execution. Should an SFA fail to obtain CDE approval prior to advertising the RFP or executing the contract, the CDE will consider the SFA noncompliant with federal procurement regulations. Consequently, the CDE may withhold program funds and the SFA will need to use other funds to pay the food service management company (FSMC) until approval has been granted (7 CFR, sections 210.21[f][2] and 210.24).

The CDE procurement approval process starts with the SFA completing the CDE procurement questionnaire, available on the Resources tab. The SFA’s answers provide a basis for CDE School Food Service Contracts Unit (SFSCU) Specialists to customize their technical assistance.

Timeline to Obtain Approval from the California Department of Education

Most FSMC contracts are effective July 1. Considering the length of time required to conduct a competitive proposal process and obtain CDE approval, SFAs should submit their bid solicitation documents to the CDE 120 days prior to the anticipated contract execution date. SFAs using the CDE sample RFP and contract are not exempt from obtaining CDE approval prior to RFP publication and subsequent contract execution.

To obtain approval and execute a contract with an effective date of July 1, the CDE suggests that SFAs adhere to the following steps and timeline:

  1. SFA develops the RFP and model contract (July–September)

  2. SFA submits initial RFP package to the CDE (by mid-October)

  3. CDE reviews and approves RFP documents (average time 90 days*)

  4. SFA advertises proposal (14 days)

  5. SFA allows bidders to submit proposals (21 days)

  6. SFA evaluates proposals and awards contract (7 days)

  7. SFA and selected contractor negotiate contract terms (7 days)

  8. SFA incorporates all negotiated terms into the contract (5 days)

  9. SFA submits all solicitation documents and negotiated contract to the CDE

  10. CDE reviews and approves the proposed contract (30 days*)

  11. SFA executes contract (5 days)

  12. SFA submits copy of executed contract to the CDE

  13. CDE reviews and approves executed contract or requests changes if executed contract differs from approved proposed contract (7 days)

* Subject to change depending on factors including, but not limited to, the number of revisions needed.

To ensure the required contract review and approval follows the above timeline, SFAs must respond to any CDE requests for information or documents within three (3) business days of receipt. SFSCU Contract Analysts will provide assistance and support throughout the RFP and contract review and approval process.

 

Noncompliance

Overview 

Federal regulations specify that school food authorities (SFA) may not use food service revenues (from the cafeteria fund) to pay for goods and services if the California Department of Education (CDE) determines that the SFA did not follow state and federal procurement procedures to obtain such services, or if the nature of the contract violates state or federal laws and regulations.

If the SFA or the contracted food service management company materially fails to comply with any term of the contract—stated in a state or federal statute or regulation, assurance, state plan or application, notice of award, or elsewhere—the CDE may take one or more of the following actions pursuant to Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations (7 CFR), Section 3016.43(a):

  1. Temporarily withhold cash payments pending correction of the deficiency by the grantee or subgrantee, or more severe enforcement action by the awarding agency (also refer to 7 CFR, Section 210.24)

  2. Disallow all or part of the cost for the activity or action not in compliance

  3. Wholly or partially suspend or terminate the current award for the grantee's or subgrantee’s program

  4. Withhold further awards for the program

  5. Take other remedies that may be legally available

When the CDE notifies the SFA of noncompliance, the SFA can either rebid the contract following California state and federal procurement procedures and applicable California state law, or pay for the services provided under the contract with other funds. If the CDE notifies an SFA of noncompliance, and the SFA continues to use the services provided under the contract without proper rebidding, the SFA may not charge the  cafeteria fund to pay for such services and the CDE may withhold program funds (7 CFR, Section 210.24).

Affect on Net Cash Resources

If an SFA continues to use services provided under an improperly procured contract and pays for these services with other funds, such as the general fund, the contract may continue. However, the lack of significant expenditures from the cafeteria fund may result in excess net cash resources (NCR).

Pursuant to 7 CFR, Section 210.14(b), SFAs are required to limit their cafeteria fund balance to an amount that does not exceed three-months’ average operating expenditures. Federal regulations under 7 CFR, Section 210.19(a)(1), authorize the CDE to require an SFA with NCR over the federal limit to reduce the price children are charged for lunches or improve food quality, or the CDE can adjust the level of the SFA’s federal reimbursements until the NCR is at or below the allowed limit.

SFAs should avoid retaining improperly procured contracts, as doing so could affect the cafeteria fund.

 

Resources

California Department of Education Sample Request for Proposal and Contract (DOC) (In Process)

School Food Authority Procurement Questionnaire (DOC) (In Process)

Regulations and Guidance

Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 7 (Agriculture) External link opens in new window or tab.

California Education Code External link opens in new window or tab.

  • Applicable sections include: 38103, 45103, 45103.1, 45103.5, and 49554

U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Food and Nutrition Service  External link opens in new window or tab.

California Department of Education Management Bulletins

Other Management Bulletins are available on the California Department of Education School Nutrition Programs Management Bulletins Web page:

  • SNP-10-2014, November 2014, Food Service Management Company Contract Preapproval

  • SNP-04-2014, October 2014, Procuring and Monitoring of Food Service Management Contracts

  • SNP-11-2014, April 2014, State Procurement Threshold for Calendar Year 2014

  • USDA-SNP-26-2013, December 2013: FSMC Sample Proposal and Contract
  • NSD-SNP-15-2013, September 2013: New School Food Service Contracts Unit
  • NSD-SNP-11-2013, August 2013: Distinguishing a Food Service Management Company From a Meal Vendor
  • USDA-SNP-30-2012, October 2012: Reminder – Compliance with Procurement Requirements

U.S. Department of Agriculture School Meals Policy Memos

Other School Meal Policy Memos issued by the USDA are available on the USDA School Meals Policy External link opens in new window or tab. Web page:

  • USDA Policy Memo SP 35-2013, External link opens in new window or tab. April 2013: State Agency Oversight and Monitoring of School Food Authority Contracts with Food Service Management Companies.

  • USDA Policy Memo SP 23-2013, External link opens in new window or tab. February 2013: Guidance Reaffirming the Requirement that State Agencies and School Food Authorities Periodically Review Food Service Management Company Cost Reimbursable Contracts and Contracts Associated with USDA Foods

Questions:   School Food Service Contracts Unit | SFSCONTRACTS@cde.ca.gov | 800-952-5609
Download Free Readers

The USDA and the CDE are equal opportunity providers and employers.
Esto explica qué hacer si usted cree que se le ha tratado injustamente.