Skip to main content
California Department of Education Logo

Record Layout: Local Indicator Priority 10

Field names, types, and descriptions for the "Coordination of Services for Foster Youth" data file for years 2022 through 2025. This local indicator only applies to county offices of education.
Field # Field Name Description
1 cdscode

County-District-School Code

  • 14-character string
2 lea

Local Education Agency (LEA)

  • Text
3 priorityNumber

Local Indicator Priority Number

  • Text
4 policydev

Policy Development with Child Welfare, Probation, Districts, to support proper placement

  • 0= The LEA has not provided a response for this rating
  • 1= Exploration and Research Phase
  • 2= Beginning Development
  • 3= Initial Implementation
  • 4= Full Implementation
  • 5= Full Implementation and Sustainability
5 capacity

Building capacity with districts, probation, Child Welfare to improve student outcomes

  • 0= The LEA has not provided a response for this rating
  • 1= Exploration and Research Phase
  • 2= Beginning Development
  • 3= Initial Implementation
  • 4= Full Implementation
  • 5= Full Implementation and Sustainability
6 edNeeds

Providing information and assistance to local educational agencies regarding the educational needs of foster youth in order to improve educational outcomes.

  • 0= The LEA has not provided a response for this rating
  • 1= Exploration and Research Phase
  • 2= Beginning Development
  • 3= Initial Implementation
  • 4= Full Implementation
  • 5= Full Implementation and Sustainability
7 edServices

Providing direct educational services for foster youth in local educational agency or county-operated programs provided the school district has certified that specified services cannot be provided or funded using other sources, including, but not limited to, Local Control Funding Formula, federal, state or local funding.

  • = The LEA has not provided a response for this rating
  • 1= Exploration and Research Phase
  • 2= Beginning Development
  • 3= Initial Implementation
  • 4= Full Implementation
  • 5= Full Implementation and Sustainability
8 records

Establishing ongoing collaboration and supporting development of policies and procedures that facilitate expeditious transfer of records, transcripts, and other relevant educational information.

  • 0= The LEA has not provided a response for this rating
  • 1= Exploration and Research Phase
  • 2= Beginning Development
  • 3= Initial Implementation
  • 4= Full Implementation
  • 5= Full Implementation and Sustainability
9 secondaryOpp

Facilitating the coordination of post-secondary opportunities for youth by engaging with systems partners, including, but not limited to, child welfare transition planning and independent living services, community colleges or universities, career technical education, and workforce development providers.

  • 0= The LEA has not provided a response for this rating
  • 1= Exploration and Research Phase
  • 2= Beginning Development
  • 3= Initial Implementation
  • 4= Full Implementation
  • 5= Full Implementation and Sustainability
10 needs

Developing strategies to prioritize the needs of foster youth in the community, using community-wide assessments that consider age group, geographical area, and identification of highest needs students based on academic needs and placement type.

  • 0= The LEA has not provided a response for this rating
  • 1= Exploration and Research Phase
  • 2= Beginning Development
  • 3= Initial Implementation
  • 4= Full Implementation
  • 5= Full Implementation and Sustainability
11 outcomeData

Engaging in the process of reviewing plan deliverables and of collecting and analyzing local educational agency and county office of education level outcome data for purposes of evaluating effectiveness of support services for foster youth and whether the investment in services contributes to improved educational outcomes for foster youth.

  • 0= The LEA has not provided a response for this rating
  • 1= Exploration and Research Phase
  • 2= Beginning Development
  • 3= Initial Implementation
  • 4= Full Implementation
  • 5= Full Implementation and Sustainability
12

performance

Performance Level

  • Met
  • Not Met
13 additionalinfo

Additional Comments

  • Text
14 meetingDate

Date taken to local governing board.

  • Date
15 year

Dashboard Year

  • Text
Questions:   Analysis Measurement & Accountability Reporting Division | Dashboard@cde.ca.gov
Last Reviewed: Thursday, November 13, 2025
Recently Posted in Accountability
  • Record Layout: Science Indicator (added 13-Nov-2025)
    Field names, types, and descriptions for the 2025 Science Indicator data file.
  • Record Layout for 2025 ELPAC Participation Rate (added 13-Nov-2025)
    Field names, types, and descriptions for the 2025 English Language Proficiency Assessments for California (ELPAC) Participation Rate data file.
  • Five-by-Five Colored Tables (added 07-Nov-2025)
    The accountability system combines five Status and Change levels creating a five-by-five color placement grid that produces twenty-five results.
  • Downloadable SARC Data Files 2024–25 (added 30-Oct-2025)
    Template table names, downloadable data files, and mapping document to populate School Accountability Report Card (SARC) Reports.
  • Updates to SARC Data 2024–25 (added 30-Oct-2025)
    Description of updates to data contained in the 2024–25 School Accountability Report Card (SARC) data files.

  • 2023–24 SARC (added 19-Sep-2025)
    Templates and data files for the School Accountability Report Card (SARC) for 2023–24.