21st CCLC and ASSETs FAQs

In 2015, the ESEA was reauthorized as the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA). ESSA can be found at: https://www.ed.gov/essa.This new legislation expands state and local accountability for student academic achievement as well as overall success and emphasizes the importance of adopting research or evidence-based practices.

Several changes have occurred since the Cohort 12 cycle (please note this is a general list and is not meant to be all-inclusive). Applicants should refer to the 21^st Century RFA for specific requirements):

• New language regarding requirements and form completion for Co-Applicants
• New required Program Income Form
• The Equitable Access Grant is only available for 21^st CCLC.
• The initial minimum grant amount is $50,000 per site, including all components. Sites who are funded at minimum are still eligible to receive grant reductions if attendance targets are not met.
• The completion of virtual training and assessments for all grantees (applicants and co-applicants) who have been awarded a grant through the Cohort 13 request for applications (RFA). Awardees listed on the initial Intent to Award (ITA) are given a set amount of time to complete this requirement. Failure to do so will result in a disqualification and the replacement awardee(s) will be allowed the same amount of time to meet this requirement.
• New language regarding the sustainability plan.

The ASES Program is a state-funded grant program while the 21^st CCLC Program is a federally funded program. The ASES Program is based primarily on the Free and Reduced-Price Meals (FRPM) percentage whereas the 21^st CCLC Program requires a more competitive process. Each program has specific eligibility and programmatic requirements such as attendance and evaluation reporting requirements that can be found in their respective RFAs.

Yes, if you calculate over the maximum legislative cap, the CDE will adjust it back down to the allowable maximum.

Yes. You may submit separate pages per site, or have multiple signatures on one page.

The decision to submit separate applications is ultimately up to the LEA, but you do have that option through ASSIST.

All FAAST system questions should be directed to the FAAST Helpdesk at FAAST_ADMIN@waterboards.ca.gov, or by calling 1-866-434-1083. The FAAST Helpdesk is available Monday–Friday (8 a.m.–5 p.m.).

Yes. You may include Letters of Agreement (LOAs) and/or Memorandum of Understandings (MOUs). Each file uploaded to FAAST must be less than 25 megabytes, but there is no limit on the number of files that can be uploaded under each attachment category.

The FAAST system cannot support documents such as tables, graphs, or charts and will only allow attachments for the Core Grant Budget form from ASSIST, a Budget Narrative, MOUs/LOAs showing collaborative partnerships, and the Equitable Access Budget form (if applicable) from ASSIST.

Each file uploaded to FAAST must be less than 25 megabytes, but there is no limit on the number of files that can be uploaded under each attachment category. Documents uploaded that are not part of the required content, will not be read.

Yes, the character limits for each text box include spaces and punctuation.

To submit the narrative as final, you must click “Preview/Submit” button, then the “Application Completion Check” button. If that comes back satisfactory, then input the submitter’s initial into the box and click the “Submit” button to finalize the application. After submitting, you should see a confirmation screen (and you should receive an email confirming submission as final). To confirm, the PIN number will appear under the “Submitted Applications” menu section rather than the “Active Applications” menu section.

Please note: FAAST narratives must be identified as “Submitted as Final” or the application narrative will be disqualified.

Yes, although the 21^st CCLC and ASSETS programs are now merged into one RFA, applicants are required to submit a separate application packet and FAAST narrative for EACH funding type. Note: Only one FAAST narrative is allowable per ASSIST identification number.

Yes. Technical assistance workshops will be held prior to the application due date . Applicants will get an opportunity to learn about the RFA process, requirements, and get an opportunity to ask questions. The CDE will also release a virtual webinar. All planned TA and webinars are subject to change based on COVID-19 challenges.

No. All application forms are due to the CDE and all narratives must be uploaded into FAAST no later than 4:00 p.m. on Tuesday, November 16, 2021. Postmarks will not be accepted for packets submitted to the CDE, and the online application system also closes at 4:00 p.m. on the due date listed above.

No. In order for grantees to apply for Before School Base grants, they must also apply an After School Base request in this RFA.

In addition, split funding will not be allowed between cohorts. If you apply for a school site in one cohort for only one component, you cannot add an additional component to that site in a different cohort. For example: ABC Elementary was awarded an after base school grant in cohort 12. This site cannot apply for a before school base or summer/ supplemental funding in the current cohort 13 RFA.

Yes, you may apply for several school sites with several program types under one application. However, the 21^st CCLC Elementary/Middle and ASSETs Programs require separate applications.

Yes. Education Code Section 8483.76[a] states that a program is eligible to receive a summer grant to operate the program in excess of 180 regular schooldays or during any combination of summer, weekends, intersession, or vacation periods.

Funding for After School Summer/Supplemental programs is as follows: $7.50 per participating student per day. After School Summer/Supplemental grants may not exceed 30 percent of the site’s total After School Base grant (including any existing ASES After School Base grant).

For example, if an elementary school receives the maximum 21^st CCLC grant amount of $112,500, their summer grant cannot exceed $33,750.

Yes. After School Summer/Supplemental requests must be accompanied by an After School Base request in this RFA or the site must currently have an ASES base after school program in order to be eligible to apply.

After school base is an after-school program provided during the regular school year that operates every regular school day. After school summer/supplemental is outside of the regular school year that may operate during intersession, vacation, and summer periods.

That is correct. Refer to Program Types and Funding in the RFA for information on the minimum and maximum amount allowed for both 21^st CCLC and ASSETS programs.

Summer max cap calculations do not include Equitable Access, but do include all other before and after school programs, including ASES (if it is a dual-funded site).

No. Equitable Access (EA) grants are optional funds intended to supplement 21st CCLC Elementary/ Middle After School Base program grants by helping provide access to 21st CCLC programs according to needs determined by the local community (EC Section 8484.8[b][1]). EA grants are only available for our 21st CCLC (elementary/ middle school) programs.

No. EA requests must be accompanied by a 21st CCLC After School Base Request in this current RFA. Only those eligible sites funded with a 21st CCLC After School Base grant through this current RFA will be considered for EA funding.

All programs must receive approval, in writing, from the CDE prior to implementing a fee-based system. Programs intending to charge fees must complete the Attachments 7 and 8 forms included in the 21^st CCLC RFA as follow:

• Clearly indicate the intention to charge fees in the grant application
• Identify the proposed fees
• Offer a sliding scale, in accordance with district policies, that is thoroughly described in the application
• Offer scholarships for those who cannot afford the fees
• Certify no student or family member will be excluded from such activities due to their inability to pay established fee
• Identify how the agency’s accounting system will be able to accurately track and report both the collection and expenditure of the fees separate from grant fees
• Identify how fees will be used to support the 21st CCLC program
• Use all income resulting from the collection of fees exclusively to fund 21st CCLC activities as approved in the grant application
• Submit additional documentation as required or requested at the discretion of the CDE

If the program is not approved to charge fees the first year or at the time of applying for funding, they must request and receive approval, in writing, from the CDE prior to implementing a fee-based system in any subsequent funding year(s).  All written requests are sent to the CDE and must ultimately be approved by the U.S. Department of Education.

The request to implement a fee-based system as outlined above includes, but is not limited to, the narrative which describes related activities related to the collection, reporting, and expenditure of program fees will be reviewed and determined for approval by the CDE. If approved, such activities are subject to audit and monitoring activities by the CDE.

An “eligible entity” refers to a LEA, community-based organization (CBO), Indian tribe or tribal organization (25 U.S.C. Section 5130), another public or private entity, or a consortium of two or more such agencies, organizations, or entities (20 U.S.C. Section 7171[b][3]). Examples of entities eligible to apply for 21st Century funds include:

•  LEAs, including school districts and county offices of education, and direct funded charter schools
•  Private schools, provided that they serve public school students
•  Nonprofit agencies
•  Public entities, city and county government agencies, organizations, or other private entities
•  Institutions of higher education
•  Native American tribes or tribal organizations
•  Community Based Organizations

Eligible entities may not apply for this RFA if they are:

•  ASES Programs seeking before school or equitable access funding.
•  Current 21st CCLC or ASES sites that have received a grant reduction in the most current year of reductions due to the agency not meeting the attendance targets. This applies to each component in the application (ex- current before school base to proposed before school base).

No. Based on the federal law (see 20 U.S.C. §7174 [b][2][F]), a school must be designated as a Title I school in order to be eligible to apply. The application must target services to students who attend Title 1 schools with at least 40% FRPM that: (1) are implementing comprehensive support and improvement activities, or targeted support and improvement activities under 20 U.S.C. Section 6311(d), or (2) other schools determined by the LEA to be in need of intervention and support (also Title 1) to improve student academic achievement and other outcomes, and serve the families of such students.

Yes. As long as the school listed on their application is designated as Title I and the district is proposing to serve Title I students. The application must target services to students who attend Title 1 schools with at least 40% FRPM that: (1) are implementing comprehensive support and improvement activities, or targeted support and improvement activities under 20 U.S.C. Section 6311(d), or (2) other schools determined by the LEA to be in need of intervention and support (also Title 1) to improve student academic achievement and other outcomes, and serve the families of such students.

Eligible entities may apply without an LEA partner, but the eligible entity will not qualify for the joint submission funding priority. When applying without an LEA partner, the eligible entity must still have approval to provide services at a public school from the public school’s LEA in the form of the LEA’s Authorized Signature on the cover page of the application. Applications without the LEA approval, will be disqualified with one exception. This exception is when the eligible entity intends to provide services at a site other than a public school, they do not need the LEA’s permission. Instead, they must have informed the LEA of their intention to provide after school services to the students at the public school site, and have record of doing so upon audit request.

No. You must apply for the 21^st CCLC Elementary/Middle Program serving grades kindergarten through ninth grade, and the ASSETs Program serving nine through twelfth grade, separately. The EC sets the maximum total after school grant amount at $112,500 per year for elementary schools and $150,000 per year for middle and junior high schools (EC Section 8482.55[c]). Ninth grade can only be funded if it is part of a middle/junior high school.

Funding will be based on the grade span served in FY 2020–21 reported in the Public Schools Data downloadable file from the CDE Public Schools and Districts Data Files web page at https://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/si/ds/pubschls.asp. If no data exists for grades served, the CDE will base funding on the grades offered.

Yes. A currently funded ASES grantee may apply for 21st Century funds, if the ASES site(s)s have not received a grant reduction in the most current year of reductions due to the agency not meeting the attendance targets. This applies to each component in the application (ex- current before school base to proposed before school base).

Yes. Per the RFA Eligibility Requirements, a public entity, city and county government agencies, organization, or other private entities may apply for 21^st Century funds provided they propose to serve Title I schools that have school wide programs. However, in order to receive funding priority consideration, the application must be jointly submitted by at least one Title 1 LEA and another eligible entity. Applicants proposing to operate an after school program at a site other than that of the regular school day activity, must complete the Off-site Program Information form (part of the ASSIST forms identified in the Application Checklist in the RFA). The program site must be located at a safe and easily accessible facility.

Applicants that do not have an existing logon to access and apply through ASSIST may request a hard copy application. Please contact the RFA helpdesk for further information and instructions (see Contact Information at the beginning of the RFA). Applicants with ASSIST logons must complete the application using ASSIST.

The CDE will no longer accept the estimated FRPM worksheet as a process for determining a site’s FRPM percentage. In order to be considered for funding, sites must have verifiable data for fiscal year 2020-21 in California Longitudinal Pupil Achievement Data System (CALPADS) to be considered in the Funding Determination process.

Yes. All original authorized signatures from the applicant or designee, and all other co-applicants are due at the time the application forms are submitted to the CDE, or the application will be disqualified. An original “wet” signature, using blue ink, from an Authorized Signature, Designee, or Co-applicant is required. Applications that are submitted with signature stamps, electronic stamps, or any form of reproduced stamp will be disqualified. Original signatures on the Cover Page represent a certification that all of the forms submitted through this RFA have been reviewed, acknowledged, and completed, and that all grant compliance will be shared equally by the signing entities.

However, if the application is signed by the Superintendent only, but not by the two co-applicants, the co-applicants will both be dropped from the application, but the application will still move forward as a single applicant submission. In this scenario, the application will not receive funding priority for a joint submission since neither co-applicant signed the application.

Yes. All original authorized signatures of the school principals or executive directors of a direct-funded charter school are due at the time the application forms are submitted to the CDE, or the school site will be disqualified (see the Signature and Approvals form in Section X. Application Checklist in this RFA). An original “wet” signature using blue ink is required.

To identify the private schools located in the attendance area, please visit the CDE California School Directory web page at https://www.cde.ca.gov/re/sd/index.asp. Applicants must retain documentation of the private school consultation certification form for audit and state monitoring purposes. Please see additional information and guidance regarding private school consultation requirements on the CDE Guidance Document web page at https://www.cde.ca.gov/sp/sw/t1/privateschoolsvs.asp.

The application scoring rubrics for the 21^st Century RFA were developed by subject matter experts based on the Quality Standards for Expanded Learning in California.

The Quality Standards can be found on the Afterschool Network website.

The process for Cohort 13 is as follows:

Reviewers will be asked to determine whether application narratives are either Passing or Not Passing, based on whether the narrative adequately describes a quality program using the criteria in the RFA. If the reviewers determine that the narrative describes a quality program then the application will be determined as Passing and will move forward in the review process for funding priority consideration.

If the reviewers determine that the narrative does not describe a quality program, then the application will be determined as Not Passing and will not move forward in the review process. Applicants that receive a Not Passing score will be notified in writing by the CDE and be given the scores for each question in the rubric as determined by the reviewers. Specific comments from reviewers will not be provided.

Application narratives are randomly assigned to readers in FAAST. Therefore, if one agency submits multiple applications, it is not guaranteed that they will be read by the same reviewer, which could result in some applications passing and some applications not passing.

Note: The professional judgement of the reader is not appealable.

Funding priority is only applied to those applications that successfully passed the initial CDE screening and received a passing score for their narratives. Those determined to be of passing quality are then considered for school level funding based on the priority categories for each school site. The required priority categories are outlined in both state and federal statute (see the 21^st Century RFA for the specific categories).

Funding priority begins with school sites that meet five priority items (21st CCLC) and four priority items (ASSETs) and will continue as far down into subsequent priority groups as funding is available.

Priority groupings in which there are more school sites than funding is available in the geographic funding distribution categories (see Geographic Funding Distribution section below) will be ordered and funded from highest to lowest Free and Reduced-Price Meals (FRPM) percentage. In the case of a tie, FRPM percentage between school sites and the overall count of passing scores for each question in the application narrative, as determined by the reviewers, will be used as a tiebreaker.

Technically, they are the same thing although the state term is “co-applicant” and the federal term is “jointly submitted.” If you submit an application with one or more co-applicant(s), you are accepting all responsibilities equally with that/those co-applicant(s) and considered by the CDE as having jointly submitted an application. In this case, the application would receive priority for a joint submission with a co-applicant.

A joint or co-application is not merely a partnership where an organization is contracted to provide services. All co-applicants listed on the grant are legally responsible to carry out the terms of the grant. A 21^st CCLC grant co-applicant is an organization/agency that is actively engaged in the planning and implementation of the project and has a long-term commitment of resources (fiscal and human capital). A vendor providing a product or service, such as a series of dance lessons, with no other input or responsibility for the 21st CCLC project is not a co-applicant.

The selection of appropriate 21^st CCLC project co-applicants requires at a minimum the following steps:

1. Reading the entire current 21^st CCLC RFA and understanding the purpose and requirements of the grant and how it will be scored.
2. Conducting a needs assessment and analyzing the results to identify the target populations and services needed.
3. Identifying potential co-applicants, including educators from the targeted school(s), who have:

• Missions aligned with the applicants;
• Expertise working with the target population(s);
• Resources needed by the target population(s) and/or applicants;
• A history of working collaboratively with other agencies.

4.  All applicants and co-applicants who are funded through this RFA, must complete a series of training videos to ensure a solid understanding of the grant requirements.

 

To be considered as a joint or co-applicant, the required form must be completed and submitted with this application by all co-applicants, ensuring:

• The LEA and all co-applicants collaborated extensively in the planning and design of the program;
• Each co-applicant organization has substantial roles to play in the planning and delivery of services;
• All co-applicant organizations share grant resources to carry out their roles;
• All co-applicant organizations have significant and ongoing involvement in the management and oversight of the program;
• An agreement between the district/school is signed.
• All co-applicants and the fiscal agent understand and agree that the fiscal agent cannot act as ‘flow-through’ for grant funds.

The CDE strongly encourages applicants to consult extensively within their communities to ensure that parents, community organizations (public or private), faith-based organizations, colleges/universities, businesses, arts and cultural organizations, and other youth development agencies can work in meaningful collaboration with schools in order to become a 21st CCLC.

The application can have multiple partnerships with community organizations and does not have to list all, or any of the partners as co-applicants. However, in order to receive priority funding consideration, at least one of those partners must apply as a co-applicant in order to receive priority for that item.

Co-applicants are entities that apply together and are both equally responsible to the CDE for the implementation of the grant requirements. When describing potential partners in this question you may be thinking of those entities that you may have MOUs or other local agreements with who are not an applicant in the application submitted to CDE. There are no restrictions on these local MOUs or other agreements that you may enter into to supply services. However, to receive the joint submission priority credit, at least one LEA and one eligible entity must apply as co-applicants.

Yes, we used to call this a consortium. We do not disqualify or limit based on the number of co-applicants. Agencies can apply with multiple co-applicants as long as the co-applicants complete and sign all the necessary forms as stated in the RFAs. This would meet the jointly submitted requirement and receive priority for that item.

Not necessarily. A partner may be a co-applicant as part of a joint application submission, but not all partners need to be a co-applicant. Collaborative partners can also be non-applicant organizations in your community that you work with to provide services to after school programs and students.

Each of these priorities are evaluated separately according to statute; therefore, each site may receive priority for different circumstances compared to another site. According to both federal and state law, funding priority shall be given to 21^st Century applications and/or schools if they meet any of the priority criteria. The breakdown of priority below the specific criteria listed in the RFA is to provide an example for what the process looks like and what possible priorities a site may qualify for.

The requirement to receive priority for that item is the application is jointly submitted by at least one Title I LEA and another eligible entity as full partners; so yes, you would have to co-apply with another eligible entity who would then also have to sign the cover page of the application. Simply including a signed MOU would not meet the priority funding requirements since that would only demonstrate a collaborative local agreement for services between entities, and does not meet the definition of jointly submitted as defined in the RFAs.

Geographic Funding Distribution will be determined by each individual school site location; therefore, the school site will fall in the Northern California rural designation. Please refer to the RFA for additional information.

The CDE will utilize the geographic boundaries as defined by the California County Superintendents Educational Services Association, which defines Northern California as regions 1–4, inclusive; Central California as regions 5–8, inclusive; and Southern California as regions 9–11, inclusive. Please see the RFA for more specific information.

Sites can determine their Rural and Urban Classifications by visiting the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) online tool and entering the search criteria as directed. If a school site is unable to identify their classification using the NCES website, then the CDE will determine their classification by identifying adjacent schools surrounding the school site.

Sites in the NCES database are identified in one of the following classifications:

Urban Classifications

11—City, Large

12—City, Midsize

13—City, Small

21—Suburb, Large

22—Suburb, Midsize

23—Suburb, Small

Rural Classifications

31—Town, Fringe

32—Town, Distant

33—Town, Remote

41—Rural, Fringe

42—Rural, Distant

43—Rural, Remote

Applications will be geographically distributed into six funding categories (northern-urban, northern-rural, central-urban, central-rural, southern-urban, and southern-rural) and be ordered for each individual school site based on funding priority first, then FRPM percentage.

Funding amounts per geographic funding category will be based on the statutory requirements for how funds are to be allocated for 21^st Century, and will be based on the percentage of students that qualify for FRPM as compared to the statewide total number of students, per geographic category.

If there are not enough quality applications for a category, the funds will be redistributed into other categories. For example, the Northern Rural funds will be redistributed to the Central and Southern Rural categories; and the Southern Urban funds will be redistributed to the Central and North Urban categories. Every effort will be made by the CDE to completely fund a site to its fully requested amount.