Skip to main content
California Department of Education Logo

School Site Design Diagrams

This page contains conceptual displays only and are intended to illustrate a specific Title 5 criterion.
Site Design Standards for Pedestrian and Vehicular Safety

The following drawings illustrate California Code of Regulations, Title 5, Section 14030 site design standards:

Bus/Parent Drop-off Example 1 (PDF). Buses do not pass through parking areas to enter or exit school sites unless a barrier is provided that prevents vehicles from backing directly into the bus loading area.
Accessible version of Bus/Parent Drop-off Example 1

Bus/Parent Drop-off Example 2 (PDF). Parent drop-off area is adjacent to school entrance and separate from bus area and parking.
Accessible version of Bus/Parent Drop-off Example 2

Bus/Parent Drop-off Example 3 (PDF). Vehicle traffic pattern does not interfere with foot traffic patterns. Foot traffic does not have to pass through entrance driveways to enter school. Crosswalks are clearly marked to define desired foot path to school entrance.
Accessible version of Bus/Parent Drop-off Example 3

Bus/Parent Drop-off Example 4 (PDF). Parking stalls are not located so vehicles must back into bus or loading areas used by parents. Island fencing or curbs are used to separate parking areas from loading/unloading areas.
Accessible version of Bus/Parent Drop-off Example 4

Bus/Parent Drop-off Example 5 (PDF). To provide equal access to insure the purposes of the least restrictive environment, bus drop-off for handicapped students is in the same location as for regular education students.
Accessible version of Bus/Parent Drop-off Example 5

Utility Access Example 6 (PDF). Delivery/utility vehicles have direct access from the street to the delivery area without crossing over playground or field areas, or interfering with bus or parent loading, unless a fence or other barrier protects students from large vehicle traffic on playgrounds. Trash pickup is fenced or otherwise isolated and away from foot traffic areas.
Accessible version of Utility Access Example 6

Sufficient Parking Example 7 (PDF). Parking spaces are sufficient for staff, visitors, and students (where applicable).
Accessible version of Sufficient Parking Example 7

Best Practices to Avoid Pedestrian and Vehicular Conflicts

The following drawings illustrate common site designs that are submitted to the California Department of Education that raise safety concerns or conflict with California Code of Regulations, Title 5 design standards, with examples of possible solutions:

Bus Drop-off/Parent Drop-off Conflict Example 8 (PDF)
Accessible version of Bus Drop-off/Parent Drop-off Conflict Example 8

Bus Drop-off/Parent Drop-off Conflict Example 9 (PDF)
Accessible version of Bus Drop-off/Parent Drop-off Conflict Example 9

Parent Drop-off/Parking Conflict Example 10 (PDF)
Accessible version of Parent Drop-off/Parking Conflict Example 10

Parent Drop-off/Parking Conflict Example 11 (PDF)
Accessible version of Parent Drop-off/Parking Conflict Example 11

Mid-block Crosswalk/Drop-off Conflict Example 12 (PDF)
Accessible version of Mid-block Crosswalk/Drop-off Conflict Example 12

Questions:   Diane Waters | dwaters@cde.ca.gov | 916-327-2884
Last Reviewed: Wednesday, May 28, 2025
Recently Posted in School Facilities
  • The Guide to Long-Range Facilities Master Plans (updated 10-Nov-2026)
    The Guide to Long-Range Facilities Master Plans (LRFMP) was revised in 2026, with updated guidance on master planning for local educational agencies and Proposition 2 requirements for school districts applying for School Facility Program Funding.
  • Key Components of a Facilities Master Plan (added 10-Nov-2026)
    The elements of a typical facilities master plan (FMP) and guidance on what to include, how to organize the information, and why it matters, from the Guide to Long-Range Facilities Master Plans.
  • Conclusion (added 10-Nov-2026)
    A summary on master plans as living documents that reflect thoughtful educational goals and future planning, from the Guide to Long-Range Facilities Master Plans.
  • Education Programs with Specialized Facility Needs (added 10-Nov-2026)
    The importance of including specialized facilities in facilities master plans to meet the needs of educational programs and students with disabilities, from the Guide to Long-Range Facilities Master Plans.
  • Additional Considerations and Planning the Future (added 10-Nov-2026)
    Integrating sustainability, safety, accessibility, and climate resiliency into every stage of facilities master planning, from the Guide to Long-Range Facilities Master Plans.

  • Appendix A (added 10-Nov-2026)
    A table of Facilities Master Plan Elements vs. Proposition 2 Requirements, from the Guide to Long-Range Facilities Master Plans.
  • Appendix B (added 10-Nov-2026)
    A summary of additional required elements per Proposition 2, from the Guide to Long- Range Facilities Master Plans.
  • Facilities Master Planning Resources (added 10-Nov-2026)
    Additional resources, facilities master plan (FMP) exemplars, and links to the Office of Public School Construction (OPSC) Guidelines for the Five-Year School Facilities Master Plan, from the Guide to Long-Range Facilities Master Plans.
  • Introduction (added 10-Nov-2026)
    An introduction of the Guide to Long-Range Facilities Master Plans.
  • Facilities Master Planning Process (added 10-Nov-2026)
    Best practices for launching a facilities master planning (FMP) effort, engaging stakeholders, and long-term planning, from the Guide to Long-Range Facilities Master Plans.