LRFMP Home | Introduction | FMP Process | FMP Key Components | Specialized Facility Needs
Additional Considerations | Conclusion | Appendix A | Appendix B | FMP Resources
Contents
Chapter 1: Facilities Master Planning Process
Chapter 2: Key Components of a Facilities Master Plan
Chapter 3: Educational Programs with Specialized Facility Needs
Chapter 4: Additional Considerations and Planning for the Future
Conclusion
Appendix A: Facilities Master Plan Elements vs. Proposition 2 Requirements
Appendix B: Additional Required Elements per Proposition 2
Facilities Master Planning Resources
Purpose of the Guidance
This document is designed to support California local educational agencies (LEAs) in the development of comprehensive, thoughtful facilities master plans (FMPs). A well-prepared FMP can serve as a valuable strategic tool for assessing facility conditions, projecting future needs, and aligning capital improvements with the LEA’s educational goals. While some elements of an FMP are now required for certain state funding applications, the primary purpose of this guidance is to assist LEAs in planning facilities effectively, regardless of whether funding is being pursued. Through thoughtful long-range planning, FMPs can help create safe, healthy, adaptable, and sustainable learning environments that support both current and future educational needs. The California Department of Education (CDE) offers this document as a non-regulatory resource for LEAs that are new to master planning or looking to strengthen their existing practices.
What is a Facilities Master Plan?
An FMP is a long-range planning document that provides a comprehensive overview of LEA facilities and outlines a roadmap for future improvements. It typically covers a period of ten or more years and incorporates data on enrollment trends, facility conditions, programmatic needs, and capital priorities. An effective FMP helps LEAs make informed decisions about how, when, and where to invest in school facilities, ensuring that physical environments support high-quality teaching and learning. The plan should be grounded in the LEA’s educational vision and developed through a collaborative and transparent process with stakeholders.
In addition to supporting capital planning and facility management, FMPs can serve as important tools for advancing educational goals, student health, and improving long-term climate resilience. LEAs are encouraged to consider how school facilities influence student well-being, instructional delivery, safety, and continuity during environmental or operational disruptions.
Summary of Proposition 2 Requirements
Assembly Bill 247 (2023), known as Proposition 2, introduced new requirements for school districts applying for the California School Facility Program (SFP) funding. Effective October 31, 2024, LEAs must submit a five-year FMP to the California Office of Public School Construction (OPSC) as a condition of funding.
While this CDE guidance document is not intended to interpret or enforce those requirements, LEAs may find it helpful to be aware of the elements identified in statute. Education Code Section 17070.54(c)
, outlines the minimum components that must be included in these plans when submitted for SFP funding purposes.
LEAs should refer directly to OPSC’s Five-Year School Facilities Master Plans
resources and OPSC’s School Facility Program Guidelines for the Five-Year School Facilities Master Plan
(PDF) which includes instructions for specific requirements related to funding applications.
Please see appendix A, Facilities Master Plan Elements Vs. Proposition 2 Requirements, for a detailed chart that provides a summary of FMP elements and what is required for FMPs under Proposition 2.
The Role of the California Department of Education vs. the Office of Public School Construction
The CDE and OPSC play distinct roles in the realm of school facilities. The CDE is responsible for reviewing school site and plan approvals under the California Code of Regulations Title 5 (5 CCR). OPSC, a part of the California Department of General Services (DGS), administers the SFP and manages funding applications and approvals.
This guidance is provided by the CDE solely to support LEAs in developing their own FMPs. The CDE does not review, approve, or enforce FMPs, and submission of an FMP to OPSC is not routed through the CDE. This document is not regulatory and should not be interpreted as establishing requirements or criteria for funding eligibility.
How to Use This Document
This document is organized around the major components of a typical FMP. Each section offers general guidance, common planning practices, and key considerations that may support effective decision-making. Additional required elements and helpful resources can be found under appendix B and the Facilities Master Planning Resources section of this guide. While some sections highlight elements that are also required under Proposition 2, the primary goal is to help LEAs approach facilities master planning in a structured, thoughtful, and inclusive manner. LEAs are encouraged to adapt the recommendations in this guidance to suit their local context, available resources, and planning objectives.
Disclaimer
This guidance is intended to provide general information and best practices to assist local educational agencies in developing facilities master plans. It is not binding and does not establish regulatory requirements. LEAs pursuing SFP funding should refer to Education Code Section 17070.54(c)
. and consult OPSC for current eligibility and submission requirements.
This document does not constitute legal advice. LEAs are encouraged to consult with legal counsel or appropriate agencies, as needed, to ensure compliance with applicable statutes and regulations.