Skip to main content
California Department of Education Logo

2018 LCFF Assistance Status Record Layout

Field names and descriptions for the 2018 Local Control Funding Formula Assistance Status Record Layout.
Field Name Description Acceptable Values
Cdcode CD Code 7-character string
CDS CDS Code 14-character string
LEAname Local Educational Agency (LEA) Name Text
Cityname City Name Text
Countyname County Name Text
Gsoffered Grade Span Offered Text
ReportingYear Reporting Year ‘2018’
AApriorities Priority Areas Met by the Black/African American Student Group *See acceptable values after end of table on page 2.
AIpriorities Priority Areas Met by the American Indian or Alaska Native American Student Group *See acceptable values after end of table on page 2.
ASpriorities Priority Areas Met by the Asian American Student Group *See acceptable values after end of table on page 2.
ELpriorities Priority Areas Met by the English Learner Student Group *See acceptable values after end of table on page 2.
FIpriorities Priority Areas Met by the Filipino Student Group *See acceptable values after end of table on page 2.
FOSpriorities Priority Areas Met by the Foster Youth Student Group *See acceptable values after end of table on page 2.
HIpriorities Priority Areas Met by the Hispanic Student Group *See acceptable values after end of table on page 2.
HOMpriorities Priority Areas Met by the Homeless Student Group *See acceptable values after end of table on page 2.
PIpriorities Priority Areas Met by the Pacific Islander Student Group *See acceptable values after end of table on page 2.
SEDpriorities Priority Areas Met by the Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Student Group *See acceptable values after end of table on page 2.
SWDpriorities Priority Areas Met by the Students with Disabilities Student Group *See acceptable values after end of table on page 2.
TOMpriorities Priority Areas Met by the Two or More Races Student Group *See acceptable values after end of table on page 2.
WHpriorities Priority Areas Met by the White Student Group *See acceptable values after end of table on page 2.
TotalStudentGroups Number of Student Groups that Met Two or More State Indicator Priority Areas Integer
AssistanceStatus2017 Assistance Status of LEA in 2017

General Support = LEA was eligible to receive general support
Differentiated Support = LEA was eligible to receive differentiated support

AssistanceStatus2018 Assistance Status of LEA in 2018

General Support = LEA is eligible to receive general support
Differentiated Support = LEA is eligible to receive differentiated support

MetMethod1 Reports Whether the LEA was Identified for Differentiated Assistance Based on Method 1 (one or more student group(s) in at least two state priority areas met the criteria)

Y=Met Method 1 Criteria

N=Did not meet Method 1 Criteria
MetMethod2 Reports Whether LEA Was Identified for Differentiated Assistance Based on Method 2 (LEA assessed their progress on at least two local indicators as not met for two or more consecutive years)

Y=Met Method 2 Criteria

N=Did not meet Method 2 Criteria
MetMethod3 Reports Whether LEA Was Identified for Differentiated Assistance Based on Method 3 (at least one student group in only one state priority area met the criteria and the LEA assessed their progress on only one local indicator in a different priority area as not met for two or more consecutive years)

Y=Met Method 3 Criteria and was not identified under Method 1 or Method 2

N=Did not meet Method 3 Criteria

*The ‘Acceptable Values’ for all ‘student GROUPpriorities’ fields (i.e., ‘AApriorities,’ ‘AIpriorities,’‘ASpriorities,’ ‘ELpriorities,’ ‘FIpriorities,’ ‘FOSpriorities,’ ‘HIpriorities,’ ‘HOMpriorities,’‘TOMpriorities,’ ‘PIpriorities,’ ‘SEDpriorities,’ ‘SWDpriorities,’ and ‘WHpriorities’) are as follows:

A = Met Criteria in Priority Areas 4, 5, and 6

B = Met Criteria in Priority Areas 4 and 5

C = Met Criteria in Priority Areas 5 and 6

D = Met Criteria in Priority Areas 4 and 6

E = Met Criteria in Priority Areas 4 and 8

F = Met Criteria in Priority Areas 5 and 8

G = Met Criteria in Priority Areas 6 and 8

H = Met Criteria in Priority Areas 4, 5, and 8

I = Met Criteria in Priority Areas 4, 6, and 8

J = Met Criteria in Priority Areas 5, 6, and 8

K = Met Criteria in Priority Areas 4, 5, 6, and 8

BLANK

Questions: Local Agency Systems Support Office | lcff@cde.ca.gov | 916-319-0809 
Last Reviewed: Wednesday, January 9, 2019
Recently Posted in Allocations & Apportionments
  • LCFF COLA (added 20-Feb-2019)
    Information on historical and prospective Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) percentages since 2013–14, the inception of LCFF.
  • LtrQ3-18: EPA Payment letter, FY 18-19 Q3 (added 20-Feb-2019)
    Third quarterly apportionment for the Education Protection Account for fiscal year 2018-19.
  • Funding Excel Files, FY 2018–19 P-1 (added 20-Feb-2019)
    Apportionment exhibits provide detail of the distribution of funds by either county and/or local educational agency (LEA) for fiscal year (FY) 2018–19 P-1.
  • 2018-19 First Principal Apportionment (P-1) Letter (added 20-Feb-2019)
    Letter to county superintendents of schools, auditors, and treasurers for the 2018-19 First Principal Apportionment.
  • CARS News Flash #65 (added 19-Feb-2019)
    News Flash 65 was sent out announcing the Consolidated Application and Reporting System (CARS) was on schedule for a January 15, 2019 release of the data collections and included a summary of the changes of the data collections.